An analysis of results in a single-blinded, prospective randomized controlled trial comparing non-fixating versus self-fixating mesh for laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

An analysis of results in a single-blinded, prospective randomized controlled trial comparing non-fixating versus self-fixating mesh for laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair

Published:2019-01-09 Issue:8 Volume:33 Page:2670-2679
ISSN:0930-2794
Container-title:Surgical Endoscopy
language:en
Short-container-title:Surg Endosc

Author:

Denham Merritt,Johnson Brandon,Leong Michelle,Kuchta Kristine,Conaty Eliza,Ujiki Michael B.,Denham Woody,Haggerty Stephen P.,Butt Zeeshan,Carbray JoAnn,Gitelis Matt,Linn John G.^ORCID

Funder

Medtronic

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Surgery

Link

http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00464-018-6555-8.pdf

Reference22 articles.

1. Andersson B, Halle´n M, Leveau P, Bergenfelz A, Westerdahl J (2003) Laparoscopic extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair versus open mesh repair: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Surgery 133:464–472

2. Franneby U, Sandblom G, Nordin O et al (2006) Risk factors for long-term pain after hernia surgery. Ann Surg 244:212–219

3. Bringman S, Ramel S, Heikkinen TJ et al (2003) Tension-free inguinal hernia repair: TEP versus mesh-plug versus Lichtenstein: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 237:142–147