Impact of the endoscopic surgical skill qualification system on conversion to laparotomy after low anterior resection for rectal cancer in Japan (a secondary analysis of the EnSSURE study)

Author:

Goto Koki,Watanabe Jun,Nagasaki Toshiya,Uemura Mamoru,Ozawa Heita,Kurose Yohei,Akagi TomonoriORCID,Ichikawa Nobuki,Iijima Hiroaki,Inomata Masafumi,Taketomi Akinobu,Naitoh Takeshi, ,Furutani Akinobu,Kanazawa Akiyoshi,Noda Akiyoshi,Ishibe Atsushi,Tani Chikayoshi,Yamamoto Daisuke,Fujita Fumihiko,Teraishi Fuminori,Ishida Fumio,Asahara Fumitaka,Karasawa Hideaki,Osawa Hideki,Nagano Hiroaki,Takeshita Hiroaki,Ota Hirofumi,Suwa Hirokazu,Ochiai Hiroki,Ogawa Hiroomi,Saeki Hiroshi,Hasegawa Hirotoshi,Bando Hiroyuki,Horie Hisanaga,Nagahara Hisashi,Hayashibara Kaori,Uehara Kay,Takehara Kazuhiro,Kojo Ken,Okamoto Ken,Saito Kenichiro,Ikeda Koji,Munakata Koji,Otsuka Koki,Hida Koya,Nagakari Kunihiko,Shimomura Manabu,Shiozawa Manabu,Takata Manabu,Yamamoto Manabu,Ito Masaaki,Numata Masakatsu,Watanabe Masahiko,Miguchi Masashi,Ozawa Mayumi,Takatsuki Mitsuhisa,Aisu Naoya,Sawada Naruhiko,Suzuki Nobuaki,Ikeshima Ryo,Inada Ryo,Oshima Ryuichi,Maruyama Satoshi,Kojima Shigehiro,Yamaguchi Shigeki,Homma Shigenori,Fujino Shiki,Mori Shinichiro,Ohnuma Shinobu,Takeda Sho,Aoyama Shota,Saito Shuji,Mukai Shunpei,Takahashi Shusaku,Sasaki Takahiro,Yamanashi Takahiro,Matsuda Takeru,Miura Takuya,Fukuoka Tatsunari,Ono Tatsunori,Kinjo Tatsuya,Shonaka Tatsuya,Godai Teni,Funakoshi Tohru,Adachi Tomohiro,Yamaguchi Tomohiro,Furuhata Tomohisa,Kimura Toshimoto,Aiba Toshisada,Fujiwara Toshiyoshi,Shimamura Tsukasa,Mizushima Tsunekazu,Iseki Yasuhito,Sumi Yasuo,Rino Yasushi,Kamada Yasuyuki,Kita Yoshiaki,Kakeji Yoshihiro,Takashima Yoshihiro,Ide Yoshihito,Sakai Yoshiharu,Munemoto Yoshinori,Akagi Yoshito,Ishii Yoshiyuki,Inoue Yuji,Kiyozumi Yuki,Kokuba Yukihito,Todate Yukitoshi,Suwa Yusuke,Sakimura Yusuke,Shimodaira Yusuke

Abstract

Abstract Background and aims Conversion to laparotomy is among the serious intraoperative complications and carries an increased risk of postoperative complications. In this cohort study, we investigated whether or not the Endoscopic Surgical Skill Qualification System (ESSQS) affects the conversion rate among patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer. Methods We performed a retrospective secondary analysis of data collected from patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery for cStage II and III rectal cancer from 2014 to 2016 across 56 institutions affiliated with the Japan Society of Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery. Data from the original EnSSURE study were analyzed to investigate risk factors for conversion to laparotomy by performing univariate and multivariate analyses based on the reason for conversion. Results Data were collected for 3,168 cases, including 65 (2.1%) involving conversion to laparotomy. Indicated conversion accounted for 27 cases (0.9%), while technical conversion accounted for 35 cases (1.1%). The multivariate analysis identified the following independent risk factors for indicated conversion to laparotomy: tumor diameter [mm] (odds ratio [OR] 1.01, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01–1.05, = 0.0002), combined resection of adjacent organs [+/−] (OR 7.92, 95% CI 3.14–19.97, < 0.0001), and surgical participation of an ESSQS-certified physician [−/+] (OR 4.46, 95% CI 2.01–9.90, = 0.0002). The multivariate analysis identified the following risk factors for technical conversion to laparotomy: registered case number of institution (OR 0.99, 95% CI 0.99–1.00, = 0.0029), institution type [non-university/university hospital] (OR 3.52, 95% CI 1.54–8.04, = 0.0028), combined resection of adjacent organs [+/−] (OR 5.96, 95% CI 2.15–16.53, = 0.0006), and surgical participation of an ESSQS-certified physician [−/+] (OR 6.26, 95% CI 3.01–13.05, < 0.0001). Conclusions Participation of ESSQS-certified physicians may reduce the risk of both indicated and technical conversion. Referral to specialized institutions, such as high-volume centers and university hospitals, especially for patients exhibiting relevant background risk factors, may reduce the risk of conversion to laparotomy and lead to better outcomes for patients. Trial Registration This study was registered with the Japanese Clinical Trials Registry as UMIN000040645.

Funder

Oita University

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Reference48 articles.

1. Kang SB, Park JW, Jeong SY, Nam BH, Choi HS, Kim DW, Lim SB, Lee TG, Kim DY, Kim JS, Chang HJ, Lee HS, Kim SY, Jung KH, Hong YS, Kim JH, Sohn DK, Kim DH, Oh JH (2010) Open versus laparoscopic surgery for mid or low rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (COREAN trial): short-term outcomes of an open-label randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 11:637–645

2. van der Pas MH, Haglind E, Cuesta MA, Fürst A, Lacy AM, Hop WC, Bonjer HJ (2013) Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer (COLOR II): short-term outcomes of a randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 14:210–218

3. Fleshman J, Branda M, Sargent DJ, Boller AM, George V, Abbas M, Peters WR Jr, Maun D, Chang G, Herline A, Fichera A, Mutch M, Wexner S, Whiteford M, Marks J, Birnbaum E, Margolin D, Larson D, Marcello P, Posner M, Read T, Monson J, Wren SM, Pisters PW, Nelson H (2015) Effect of laparoscopic-assisted resection vs open resection of stage ii or iii rectal cancer on pathologic outcomes: the ACOSOG Z6051 randomized clinical trial. JAMA 314:1346–1355

4. Stevenson AR, Solomon MJ, Lumley JW, Hewett P, Clouston AD, Gebski VJ, Davies L, Wilson K, Hague W, Simes J (2015) Effect of laparoscopic-assisted resection vs open resection on pathological outcomes in rectal cancer: the ALaCaRT randomized clinical trial. JAMA 314:1356–1363

5. Bonjer HJ, Deijen CL, Abis GA, Cuesta MA, van der Pas MH, de Lange-de Klerk ES, Lacy AM, Bemelman WA, Andersson J, Angenete E, Rosenberg J, Fuerst A, Haglind E (2015) A randomized trial of laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer. N Engl J Med 372:1324–1332

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3