The averch and Johnson analysis of public utility regulation twenty years later-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

The averch and Johnson analysis of public utility regulation twenty years later

Published:1985-06 Issue:2 Volume:2 Page:178-193
ISSN:0889-938X
Container-title:Review of Industrial Organization
language:en
Short-container-title:Rev Ind Organ

Author:

Sherman Roger

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Management of Technology and Innovation,Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Strategy and Management,Economics and Econometrics

Link

http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/BF02354220.pdf

Reference42 articles.

1. Harvey Averch and Leland L. Johnson, “Behavior of the Firm Under Regulatory Constraint,”American Economic Review, Vol. 52, December 1962, 1053–69.

2. Elizabeth E. Bailey, “Peak-Load Pricing under Regulatory Constraint.”Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 50, July 1972, 662–79.

3. Elizabeth E. Bailey,Economic Theory of Regulatory Constraint, Lexington, Mass.: D.C. Heath, 1973.

4. Elizabeth E. Bailey and L. J. White, “Reversals in Peak and Off Peal: Prices,” Bell Journal of Economics, Vol. 5, Spring 1974, 75–92.

5. William J. Baumol, “Reasonable Rules for Rate Regulation: Plausible Policies for and Imperfect World,” in Almarin Phillips and Cliver E. Williamson, eds.,Prices: Issues in Theory Practice and Public Policy, Philadelphia, Pa.: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1968.

Cited by 21 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Reform of the Irish water sector: opportunities and challenges;Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Water Management;2017-08

2. Performance of the Tunisian Water Utility: An input-distance function approach;Utilities Policy;2016-02

3. Reevaluation of Vertical Integration and Unbundling in Restructured Electricity Markets;Competitive Electricity Markets;2008

4. A Note on the Technical and Allocative Efficiency of Local Exchange Carriers in the United States;Quality & Quantity;2006-06

5. Market power and the deregulation of special access service by the Federal Communications Commission;Information & Communications Technology Law;2004-06