Abstract
Abstract
Purpose
Morphological magnetic resonance (MR) and computed tomography (CT) features are used in combination with histology for diagnosis and treatment selection of primary bone neoplasms. Isolated functional MRI parameters have shown potential in diagnosis. Our goal is to facilitate diagnosis of primary bone neoplasms of the skull base, mobile spine and sacrum, by a comprehensive approach, combining morphological and functional imaging parameters.
Materials and methods
Pre-treatment MR of 80 patients with histologically proven diagnosis of a primary bone neoplasm of the skull base, mobile spine and sacrum were retrospectively analyzed for morphological and functional MRI parameters. Functional parameters were measured in 4 circular regions of interest per tumor placed on non-adjacent scan slices. Differences in values of functional parameters between different histologies were analyzed with Dunn’s test.
Results
Chordomas were the predominant histology (60.0%). Most neoplasms (80.0%) originated in the midline and had geographical (78.2%) bone destruction. Amorphous-type calcification (pre-existing bone) was seen only in chordomas. Homogeneous contrast enhancement pattern was seen only in chondrosarcoma and plasmacytoma. Ktrans and Kep were significantly lower in both chordoma, and chondrosarcoma compared to giant cell tumor of the bone (p = 0.006 – 0.011), and plasmacytoma (p = 0.004 – 0.014). Highest diffusion-weighted MRI apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values corresponded to chondrosarcoma and were significantly higher to those of chordoma (p = 0.008).
Conclusion
We identified the most discriminating morphological parameters and added functional MR parameters based on histopathological features that are useful in making a confident diagnosis of primary bone neoplasms in the skull base, mobile spine and sacrum.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference26 articles.
1. WHO Classification of Tumours Editorial Board. Soft tissue and bone tumours. 5th ed. Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2020.
2. Mechri M, Riahi H, Sboui I, Bouaziz M, Vanhoenacker F, Ladeb M. Imaging of malignant primitive tumors of the spine. J Belg Soc Radiol. 2018;102(1):56. Published 2018 Sep 6. https://doi.org/10.5334/jbsr.1410.
3. Cho Young Hyun, Kim Jeong Hoon, Khang Shin Kwang, Lee Jung-Kyo, Kim Chang Jin. Chordomas and chondrosarcomas of the skull base: Comparative analysis of clinical results in 30 patients. Neurosurg Rev. 2007;31(1): 35–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-007-0099-z.
4. Si MJ, Wang CS, Ding XY, Yuan F, Du LJ, Lu Y, Zhang WB. Differentiation of primary chordoma, giant cell tumor and schwannoma of the sacrum by Ct and Mri. Eur J Radiol. 2013;82(12):2309–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2013.08.034. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24035342.
5. Brunel H, Peretti-Viton P, Beneguigui-Charmeau V, Borrione F, Roche P, Do L, Raybaud C. L’irm - Un Examen Indispensable Dans La Prise En Charge Des Chordomes Sacro-Coccygiens. J Neuroradiol. 2002;29:15–22.