Abstract
AbstractNew structural sheet metal parts are developed in an iterative, time-consuming manner. To improve the reproducibility and speed up the iterative drawability assessment, we propose a novel low-dimensional multi-fidelity inspired machine learning architecture. The approach utilizes the results of low-fidelity and high-fidelity finite element deep drawing simulation schemes. It hereby relies not only on parameters, but also on additional features to improve the generalization ability and applicability of the drawability assessment compared to classical approaches. Using the machine learning approach on a generated data set for a wide range of different cross-die drawing configurations, a classifier is trained to distinguish between drawable and non-drawable setups. Furthermore, two regression models, one for drawable and one for non-drawable designs are developed that rank designs by drawability. At instantaneous evaluation time, classification scores of high accuracy as well as regression scores of high quality for both regressors are achieved. The presented models can substitute low-fidelity finite element models due to their low evaluation times while at the same time, their predictive quality is close to high-fidelity models. This approach may enable fast and efficient assessments of designs in early development phases at the accuracy of a later design phase in the future.
Funder
Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Energie
Ostbayerische Technische Hochschule Regensburg
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Materials Science
Reference25 articles.
1. Ambrogio G, Ciancio C, Filice L et al (2017) Innovative metamodelling-based process design for manufacturing: an application to incremental sheet forming. Int J Mater Form 10(3):279–286. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12289-015-1276-1
2. Banabic D (2010) Sheet metal forming processes: Constitutive modelling and numerical simulation. Springer, Berlin and Heidelberg
3. Birkert A, Haage S, Straub M (2013) Umformtechnische Herstellung komplexer Karosserieteile. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberghttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-34670-5
4. Carvalho-Resende T, Balan T, Bouvier S et al (2013) Numerical investigation and experimental validation of a plasticity model for sheet steel forming. Model Simul Mater Sci Eng 21(1):015,008. https://doi.org/10.1088/0965-0393/21/1/015008
5. Fleischer M, Sitz S, Asen F, et al (2022) Simulaton of sheet metal forming and current developments. In: 16. LS-DYNA Forum 2022, URL https://www.dynamore.de/de/fortbildung/konferenzen/vergangene/16-ls-dyna-forum-2022/fleischer_bmw-group.pdf. Accessed 24 May 2023
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Complementing Drawability Assessment of Deep-Drawn Components With Surrogate-Based Global Sensitivity Analysis;ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part B: Mechanical Engineering;2024-04-22