Author:
van Eemeren Frans H.,Garssen Bart,Krabbe Erik C. W.,Snoeck Henkemans A. Francisca,Verheij Bart,Wagemans Jean H. M.
Reference132 articles.
1. Abbott, D. (1989). The jurisprudential analogy. Argumentation and the new rhetoric. In R. D. Dearin (Ed.), The new rhetoric of Chaïm Perelman. Statement and response (pp. 191–199). Lanham: University Press of America.
2. Aikin, S. F. (2008). Perelmanian universal audience and the epistemic aspirations of argument. Philosophy & Rhetoric, 41(3), 238–259.
3. Alexy, R. W. (1978). Theorie der juristischen Argumentation. Die Theorie des rationalen Diskurses als Theorie der juristischen Begründung [A theory of legal argumentation. The theory of rational discourse as theory of legal justification]. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
4. Amossy, R. (2009b). The new rhetoric’s inheritance. Argumentation and discourse analysis. Argumentation, 23, 313–324.
5. Anderson, J. R. (1972). The audience as a concept in the philosophical rhetoric of Perelman, Johnstone and Natanson. Southern Speech Communication Journal, 38(1), 39–50.