Author:
Hagiwara Y.,Saijo Y.,Ando A.,Kobayashi K.,Tanaka A.,Hozumi N.,Hatori K.,Itoi E.
Reference12 articles.
1. Tsai, C.Y., Lee, C.L., Chai, C.Y., Chen, C.H., Su, J.Y., Huang, H.T., Huang, M.H.: The validity of in vitro ultrasonographic grading of osteoarthritic femoral condylar cartilage–a comparison with histologic grading. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 15, 245–250 (2007)
2. Spriet, M.P., Girard, C.A., Foster, S.F., Harasiewicz, K., Holdsworth, D.W., Laverty, S.: Validation of a 40 MHz B-scan ultrasound biomicroscope for the evaluation of osteoarthritis lesions in an animal model. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 13, 171–179 (2005)
3. Mazzuca, S.A., Brandt, K.D., Katz, B.P.: Is conventional radiography suitable for evaluation of a disease-modifying drug in patients with knee osteoarthritis?’ Osteoarthritis Cartilage 5, 217–226 (1997)
4. Martel, W., Adler, R.S., Chan, K., Niklason, L., Helvie, M.A., Jonsson, K.; Overview: new methods in imaging osteoarthritis. J. Rheumatol. 18(Suppl 27), 32–37 (1991)
5. Peterfy, C.G., Schneider, E., Nevitt, M.: The osteoarthritis initiative: report on the design rationale for the magnetic resonance imaging protocol for the knee. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 16, 1433–1441 (2008)