1. Andresen, M. A. (2010). The place of environmental criminology within criminological thought. In M. A. Andresen, P. J. Brantingham, & J. Kinney (Eds.), Classics in environmental criminology. Boca Raton: CRC Press.
2. Andresen, M. A., & Malleson, N. (2011). Testing the stability of crime patterns: Implications for theory and policy. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 48(1), 58–82. doi: 10.1177/0022427810384136 .
3. Axelrod, R. (1997). Advancing the art of simulation in the social sciences. In R. Conte, R. Hegselmann, & P. Terna (Eds.), Simulating social phenomena (pp. 21–40). Berlin: Springer.
4. Axtell, R. (2000). Why agents? On the varied motivations for agent computing in the social science. Center on Social and Economic Dynamics Working Paper No. 17. Available at http://www.brookings.edu/es/dynamics/papers/agents/agents.htm . Accessed Jan 2007.
5. Bafna, S. (2003). Space syntax: A brief introduction to its logic and analytical technique. Environment and Behaviour, 35(17), 17–29.