Defining normative systems for qualitative argumentation-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Defining normative systems for qualitative argumentation

Published:1996 Issue: Volume: Page:449-463
ISSN:0302-9743
Container-title:Practical Reasoning
language:
Short-container-title:

Author:

Parsons Simon

Publisher

Springer Berlin Heidelberg

Link

http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/3-540-61313-7_93

Reference19 articles.

1. Dague, P. (1993) Symbolic reasoning with relative orders of magnitude, Proceedings of the 13th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Chambery, France.

2. Darwiche, A. (1993) A symbolic generalization of probability theory, Ph.D. Thesis, Stanford.

3. Dawes, R. (1979) The robust beauty of improper linear models, American Psychologist, 34, 571–582.

4. Druzdzel, M. J. and Henrion, M. (1993) Efficient reasoning in qualitative probabilistic networks, Proceedings of the 11th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Washington.

5. Dubois, D. and Prade, H. (1979) Fuzzy real algebra: some results, Fuzzy sets and systems, 2, 327–348.

Cited by 8 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Probabilistic qualification of attack in abstract argumentation;International Journal of Approximate Reasoning;2014-01

2. A probabilistic approach to modelling uncertain logical arguments;International Journal of Approximate Reasoning;2013-01

3. Ramification analysis using causal mapping;Data & Knowledge Engineering;2000-01

4. Arguing about beliefs and actions;Applications of Uncertainty Formalisms;1998

5. Representing and applying knowledge for argumentation in a social context;AI & Society;1997-03