Abstract
AbstractThis article aims to rethink the clinical and social work with forced migrants through the concept of “field” as it is described in the context of Bionian psychoanalysis. The proposed approach goes beyond the individual trauma of the refugee, to arrive at a clinic of the “traumatic field” that includes, but also overcomes, the dyadic relationship searching for the link between intra-psychic, inter-psychic and social dimensions. The work with mediation “devices”, the dream field, and the group as a social witness will be discussed as operational tools of a clinical social practice of intervention extended to relevant emerging social contexts.
Funder
Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Health (social science)
Reference57 articles.
1. Baird, S. L., & Alaggia, R. (2021). Trauma-informed groups: recommendations for group work practice. Clinical Social Work Journal, 49, 10–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10615-019-00739-7
2. Baranger, W., & Baranger, M. (1962). La situazione analitica come campo dinamico [The analytic situation as dynamic field]. In W. Baranger & M. Baranger (Eds.), La situazione psicoanalitica come campo bipersonale [The psychoanalytic situation as bipersonal field]. Raffaello Cortina.
3. Benjamin, J. (2004). Beyond doer and done to: An intersubjective view of thirdness. The Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 73(1), 5–46. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2167-4086.2004.tb00151.x
4. Bohleber, W. (2007). Remembrance, trauma and collective memory: The battle for memory in psychoanalysis. The International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 88(2), 329–352. https://doi.org/10.1516/V5H5-8351-7636-7878
5. Bromberg, P. M. (2006). Awakening the dreamer: Clinical Journey. The Analytic Press.
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献