Abstract
AbstractDepressive disorders are related to social withdrawal and a loss of social contacts. Moreover, a lack of social integration and social support are risk factors for relapse and rehospitalization. Despite the crucial role of social networks for mental health and social support, knowledge about the structure of social networks or how they promote social support in terms of coping with depressive disorders is scarce. The present study aims to analyze social support in people with depressive disorders using ego-centered social network analysis for formal description. Ninety-seven former psychiatric inpatients participated in the study. Network size and density, a small number of conflicts in the relationships of ego to alters, and the multiplexity of social support dimensions were associated with perceived social support—measured via Social Support Questionnaire (F-Soz-U-K-14). Considering relational ratios which correlated with perceived social support, five types of social support networks were differentiated by means of cluster analysis: (1) no social support, (2) professionally supported birth family, (3) the more the merrier, (4) concentrated support, (5) overchallenged nuclear family. More than each relational characteristic on its own, their co-occurring patterns as network types provide the very structures of social support. This underpins the crucial role of structural approaches and networking skills in social work practice. German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS): DRKS00011561. Trial registration date: 10. March 2017.
Funder
internal research fund of the Protestant University of applied Sciences Freiburg
Research Group on Psychotherapy and Health Services Research, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical Centre – University of Freiburg
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Health (social science)
Reference53 articles.
1. Addams, J. (1910). Twenty years at hull house. Macmillan.
2. Albert, M., Becker, T., Mccrone, P., & Thornicroft, G. (1998). Social networks and mental health service utilization: A literature review. International Journal of Social Psychiatry, 44, 248–266. https://doi.org/10.1177/002076409804400402
3. Bachmann, S., Bottmner, C., Jacob, S., & Schröder, J. (2006). Perceived Criticism in schizophrenia: A comparison of instruments for the assessment of the patient’s perspective and its relation to relatives’ expressed emotion. Psychiatry Research, 142, 167–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2005.10.001
4. Berkman, L. G., Glass, T., Brissette, I., & Seeman, T. E. (2000). From social integration to health: Durkheim in the new millennium. Social Science and Medicine, 51, 843–857. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(00)00065-4
5. Bitzer, E.-M., Grobe, T. G., Neusser, S., Mieth, I., & Schwartz, F. W. (2011). Barmer GEK Report Krankenhaus 2011. Asgard-Verlag.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献