Mobile Apps for Wound Assessment and Monitoring: Limitations, Advancements and Opportunities
-
Published:2024-08-24
Issue:1
Volume:48
Page:
-
ISSN:1573-689X
-
Container-title:Journal of Medical Systems
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:J Med Syst
Author:
Kabir Muhammad Ashad,Samad Sabiha,Ahmed Fahmida,Naher Samsun,Featherston Jill,Laird Craig,Ahmed Sayed
Abstract
AbstractWith the proliferation of wound assessment apps across various app stores and the increasing integration of artificial intelligence (AI) in healthcare apps, there is a growing need for a comprehensive evaluation system. Current apps lack sufficient evidence-based reliability, prompting the necessity for a systematic assessment. The objectives of this study are to evaluate the wound assessment and monitoring apps, identify limitations, and outline opportunities for future app development. An electronic search across two major app stores (Google Play store, and Apple App Store) was conducted and the selected apps were rated by three independent raters. A total of 170 apps were discovered, and 10 were selected for review based on a set of inclusion and exclusion criteria. By modifying existing scales, an app rating scale for wound assessment apps is created and used to evaluate the selected ten apps. Our rating scale evaluates apps’ functionality and software quality characteristics. Most apps in the app stores, according to our evaluation, do not meet the overall requirements for wound monitoring and assessment. All the apps that we reviewed are focused on practitioners and doctors. According to our evaluation, the app ImitoWound got the highest mean score of 4.24. But this app has 7 criteria among our 11 functionalities criteria. Finally, we have recommended future opportunities to leverage advanced techniques, particularly those involving artificial intelligence, to enhance the functionality and efficacy of wound assessment apps. This research serves as a valuable resource for future developers and researchers seeking to enhance the design of wound assessment-based applications, encompassing improvements in both software quality and functionality.
Funder
Foot Balance Technology Pty Ltd Walk Easy Pedorthics Pty. Ltd. Charles Sturt University
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference91 articles.
1. Velnar, T., Bailey, T., Smrkolj, V.: The wound healing process: an overview of the cellular and molecular mechanisms. Journal of international medical research 37(5), 1528–1542 (2009) 2. Isoherranen, K., Montero, E., Atkin, L., Collier, M., Høgh, A., Ivory, J., Kirketerp-Møller, K., Meaume, S., Ryan, H., Stuermer, E., Tiplica, G., Probst, S.: Lower leg ulcer diagnosis & principles of treatment. including recommendations for comprehensive assessment and referral pathways. Journal of Wound Management 24(2), 1–76 (2023) 3. Werdin, F., Tenenhaus, M., Rennekampff, H.-O.: Chronic wound care. The Lancet 372(9653), 1860–1862 (2008) 4. Olsson, M., Järbrink, K., Divakar, U., Bajpai, R., Upton, Z., Schmidtchen, A., Car, J.: The humanistic and economic burden of chronic wounds: A systematic review. Wound repair and regeneration 27(1), 114–125 (2019) 5. Fujiwara, H., Isogai, Z., Irisawa, R., Otsuka, M., Kadono, T., Koga, M., Hirosaki, K., Asai, J., Asano, Y., Abe, M., et al.: Wound, pressure ulcer and burn guidelines–2: Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of pressure ulcers. The Journal of Dermatology 47(9), 929–978 (2020)
|
|