Domain Shifts in Machine Learning Based Covid-19 Diagnosis From Blood Tests
-
Published:2022-03-29
Issue:5
Volume:46
Page:
-
ISSN:1573-689X
-
Container-title:Journal of Medical Systems
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:J Med Syst
Author:
Roland TheresaORCID, Böck CarlORCID, Tschoellitsch ThomasORCID, Maletzky AlexanderORCID, Hochreiter SeppORCID, Meier JensORCID, Klambauer GünterORCID
Abstract
AbstractMany previous studies claim to have developed machine learning models that diagnose COVID-19 from blood tests. However, we hypothesize that changes in the underlying distribution of the data, so called domain shifts, affect the predictive performance and reliability and are a reason for the failure of such machine learning models in clinical application. Domain shifts can be caused, e.g., by changes in the disease prevalence (spreading or tested population), by refined RT-PCR testing procedures (way of taking samples, laboratory procedures), or by virus mutations. Therefore, machine learning models for diagnosing COVID-19 or other diseases may not be reliable and degrade in performance over time. We investigate whether domain shifts are present in COVID-19 datasets and how they affect machine learning methods. We further set out to estimate the mortality risk based on routinely acquired blood tests in a hospital setting throughout pandemics and under domain shifts. We reveal domain shifts by evaluating the models on a large-scale dataset with different assessment strategies, such as temporal validation. We present the novel finding that domain shifts strongly affect machine learning models for COVID-19 diagnosis and deteriorate their predictive performance and credibility. Therefore, frequent re-training and re-assessment are indispensable for robust models enabling clinical utility.
Funder
Linz Institute of Technology State of Upper Austria Johannes Kepler University Linz
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Health Information Management,Health Informatics,Information Systems,Medicine (miscellaneous)
Reference67 articles.
1. V. M. Corman, O. Landt, M. Kaiser, R. Molenkamp, A. Meijer, D. K. Chu, T. Bleicker, S. Brünink, J. Schneider, M. L. Schmidt, D. G. Mulders, B. L. Haagmans, B. Veer, S. Brink, L. Wijsman, G. Goderski, J. L. Romette, J. Ellis, M. Zambon, M. Peiris, H. Goossens, C. Reusken, M. P. G. Koopmans and C. Drosten, „Detection of 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) by real-time RT-PCR“, Euro Surveill., 25, p. 2000045, 2020. https://doi.org/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2020.25.3.2000045 2. N. Zhu, D. Zhang, W. Wang, X. Li, B. Yang, J. Song, X. Zhao, B. Huang, W. Shi, R. Lu, P. Niu, F. Zhan, X. Ma, D. Wang, W. Xu, G. Wu, G. F. Gao and W. Tan, „A Novel Coronavirus from Patients with Pneumonia in China, 2019“, N. Engl. J. Med., 382, pp. 727-733, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2001017 3. G. C. Mak, P. K. Cheng, S. S. Lau, K. K. Wong, C. S. Lau, E. T. Lam, R. C. Chan and D. N. Tsang, „Evaluation of rapid antigen test for detection of SARS-CoV-2 virus“, J. Clin. Virol., 129, p. 104500, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcv.2020.104500 4. M. J. Mina, R. Parker and D. B. Larremore, „Rethinking Covid-19 Test Sensitivity — A Strategy for Containment“, N. Engl. J. Med., 383, p. e120, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp2025631 5. E. T. Chin, B. Q. Huynh, L. A. C. Chapman, M. Murrill, S. Basu and N. C. Lo, „Frequency of Routine Testing for Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) in High-risk Healthcare Environments to Reduce Outbreaks“, Clin. Infect. Dis., p. ciaa1383, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciaa1383
Cited by
15 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|