Author:
Saaristo Leena,Ukkonen Mika T.,Wirta Erkki-Ville,Kotaluoto Sannamari,Lammi Matleena,Laukkarinen Johanna M.,Pauniaho Satu-Liisa K.
Abstract
Abstract
Objectives
Structured medical records improve readability and ensure the inclusion of information necessary for correct diagnosis and treatment. This is the first study to assess the quality of computer-generated structured medical records by comparing them to conventional medical records on patients with acute abdominal pain.
Materials and methods
A prospective double-blinded study was conducted in a tertiary referral center emergency department between January 2018 and June 2018. Patients were examined by emergency department physicians and by experience and inexperienced researcher. The researchers used a new electronical medical records system, which gathered data during the examination and the system generate structured medical records containing natural language. Conventional medical records dictated by physician and computer-generated medical records were compared by a group of independent clinicians.
Results
Ninety-nine patients were included. The overall quality of the computer-generated medical records was better than the quality of conventional human-generated medical records – the structure was similar or better in 99% of cases and the readability was similar or better in 86% of cases, p < 0.001. The quality of medical history, current illness, and findings of physical examinations were likewise better with the computer-generated recording. The results were similar when patients were examined by experienced or inexperienced researcher using the computer-generated recording.
Discussion
The quality of computer-generated structured medical records was superior to that of conventional medical records. The quality remained similar regardless of the researcher’s level of experience. The system allows automatic risk scoring and easy access for quality control of patient care. We therefore consider that it would be useful in wider practice.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Health Information Management,Health Informatics,Information Systems,Medicine (miscellaneous)
Reference12 articles.
1. Kiewiet J, Gans S, Luitse J, van Westreenen H, Lamme B, Welling L, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of surgeons and trainees in assessment of patients with acute abdominal pain. Br J Surg 2016 Sep;103(10):1343.
2. Eskelinen M, Lipponen P. Usefulness of history-taking in non-specific abdominal pain: a prospective study of 1333 patients with acute abdominal pain in Finland. In Vivo 2012 Mar-Apr;26(2):335–339.
3. Falcone JL, Schenarts KD, Ferson PF, Day HD. Using elements from an acute abdominal pain Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) leads to more standardized grading in the surgical clerkship for third-year medical students. Journal of Surgical Education 2011 Sep-Oct;68(5):408–413.
4. Eskelinen M, Ikonen J, Lipponen P. The value of history-taking, physical examination, and computer assistance in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis in patients more than 50 years old. Scand J Gastroenterol 1995 Apr;30(4):349–355.
5. Korner H, Sondenaa K, Soreide JA, Andersen E, Nysted A, Lende TH. Structured data collection improves the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Br J Surg 1998 March;85(3):341–344.