Magnetic Resonance Relaxation in Heterogeneous Materials is Analogous to First-Order Chemical Reaction
-
Published:2024-04-16
Issue:7
Volume:151
Page:1493-1509
-
ISSN:0169-3913
-
Container-title:Transport in Porous Media
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Transp Porous Med
Abstract
AbstractBiological tissue, pharmaceutical tablets, wood, porous rocks, catalytic reactors, concrete, and foams are examples of heterogeneous systems that may contain one or several fluid phases. Fluids in such systems carry chemical species that may participate in chemical reactions in the bulk of a fluid, as homogeneous reactions, or at the fluid/fluid or fluid/solid interfaces, as heterogeneous reactions. Magnetic resonance relaxation measures the return of 1H nuclear magnetization in chemical species of these fluids to an equilibrium state in a static magnetic field. Despite the perceived difference between reaction–diffusion and relaxation–diffusion in heterogeneous systems, similarities between the two are remarkable. This work draws a close parallel between magnetic resonance relaxation–diffusion and chemical reaction–diffusion for elementary unitary reaction $${\text{A}}\to {\text{B}}$$
A
→
B
in a dilute solution—both in heterogeneous systems. A striking similarity between the dimensionless numbers that characterize their relevant behavior is observed: the Damköhler number of the second kind $${{\text{Da}}}^{{\text{II}}}$$
Da
II
for reaction and the Brownstein–Tarr number $${{\text{BT}}}_{i}$$
BT
i
for relaxation. The new vision of analogy between reaction- and magnetic resonance relaxation–diffusion in heterogeneous systems encourages the exploitation of similarities between reaction and relaxation processes to noninvasively investigate the dynamics of chemical species and reactions. One such example of importance in chemical engineering is provided for solid–fluid reaction in packed beds.
Funder
Aarhus Universitet
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference50 articles.
1. Afrough, A.: Magnetic resonance free induction decay in geological porous materials. Eur. Phys. J. E 44, 107 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1140/epje/s10189-021-00110-0 2. Afrough, A., Vashaee, S., Romero Zerón, L., Balcom, B.: Absolute measurement of pore size based on nonground eigenstates in magnetic-resonance relaxation. Phys. Rev. Appl. 11, 041002 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevApplied.11.041002 3. Afrough, A., Marica, F., MacMillan, B., Balcom, B.J.: Pore-size measurement from eigenvalues of magnetic resonance relaxation. Phys. Rev. Appl. 16, 034040 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevApplied.16.034040 4. Ardenkjaer-Larsen, J.-H., Boebinger, G.S., Comment, A., Duckett, S., Edison, A.S., Engelke, F., Griesinger, C., Griffin, R.G., Hilty, C., Maeda, H., Parigi, G., Prisner, T., Ravera, E., van Bentum, J., Vega, S., Webb, A., Luchinat, C., Schwalbe, H., Frydman, L.: Facing and overcoming sensitivity challenges in biomolecular NMR spectroscopy. Angew. Chemie Int. Ed. 54, 9162–9185 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201410653 5. Baehr, H.D., Stephan, K.: Heat and mass transfer, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-29527-5
|
|