Trajectories of Change in Acute Dynamic Risk Ratings and Associated Risk for Recidivism in Paroled New Zealanders: A Joint Latent Class Modelling Approach

Author:

Stone Ariel G.ORCID,Lloyd Caleb D.,Spivak Benjamin L.,Papalia Nina L.,Serin Ralph C.

Abstract

Abstract Objectives Prior studies indicate risk for recidivism declines with time spent in the community post-incarceration. The current study tested whether declines in risk scores occurred uniformly for all individuals in a community corrections sample or whether distinct groups could be identified on the basis of similar trajectories of change in acute risk and time to recidivism. We additionally tested whether accounting for group heterogeneity improved prospective prediction of recidivism. Methods This study used longitudinal, multiple-reassessment data gathered from 3,421 individuals supervised on parole in New Zealand (N = 92,104 assessments of theoretically dynamic risk factors conducted by community corrections supervision officers). We applied joint latent class modelling (JLCM) to model group trajectories of change in acute risk following re-entry while accounting for data missing due to recidivism (i.e., missing not at random). We compared accuracy of dynamic predictions based on the selected joint latent class model to an equivalent joint model with no latent class structure. Results We identified four trajectory groups of acute dynamic risk. Groups were consistently estimated across a split sample. Trajectories differed in direction and degree of change but using the latent class structure did not improve discrimination when predicting recidivism. Conclusions There may be significant heterogeneity in how individuals’ assessed level of acute risk changes following re-entry, but determining risk for recidivism should not be based on probable group membership. JLCM revealed heterogeneity in early re-entry unlikely to be observed using traditional analytic approaches.

Funder

Swinburne University of Technology

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Law,Pathology and Forensic Medicine

Reference94 articles.

1. Andrews DA, Bonta J (2010) The psychology of criminal conduct, Anderson, Cincinnati

2. Australian Bureau of Statistics (2018) Corrective services, Australia, September Quarter 2018. www.abs.gov.au

3. Babchishin KM, Hanson RK (2020) Monitoring changes in risk of reoffending: a prospective study of 632 men on community supervision. J Consult Clin Psychol 88:886–898. https://doi.org/10.1037/ccp0000601

4. Baglivio MT, Wolff KT, Piquero AR, Howell JC, Greenwald MA (2017) Risk assessment trajectories of youth during juvenile justice residential placement. Crim Justice Behav 44:360–394. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854816668918

5. Bakker L, Riley D, O’Malley J (1999) Risk of reconviction: statistical models predicting four types of re‐offending. Wellington, NZ: Department of Corrections Psychological Service. https://www.corrections.govt.nz/__data/assets/pdf_file/0020/10667/roc.pdf

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3