The first annually resolved analysis of slash-and-burn practices in the boreal Eurasia suggests their strong climatic and socio-economic controls

Author:

Drobyshev IgorORCID,Aleinikov Alexei,Lisitsyna Olga,Aleksutin Vadim,Vozmitel Foma,Ryzhkova Nina

Abstract

AbstractSlash-and-burn (SAB) was a widespread agricultural practice across large parts of the boreal region until the early 20th century. Despite its paramount importance in the procurement of food and particularly in supporting frontier populations of settlers during the colonization of the Eurasian boreal zone, analyses of spatial and temporal patterns in the use of SAB at annual and sub-annual scales are currently missing. We present the first such analysis of climatic and social controls of SAB practices in a remote region in the northern Ural mountains from 1880 to 1894. We observed a significant positive correlation between the total number of burns and the village population (p = 0.005, R2 = 0.26), indicating that the frequency of burns directly reflected the local demand for food. The amount of agricultural land, regarded as a cumulative measure of burning activity over multiple decades, showed a strong positive correlation with the village population (p < 0.001, R2 = 0.60). This result supported our interpretation of burns as an important food procurement tool, probably also positively affected by higher labour availability in larger villages. Villages where the number of burns were higher than predicted by the “the population vs. burns” regression tended (p = 0.15) to have larger areas of arable land than predicted by the “population vs. arable land” regression. This pattern implied that variability in the local environmental and/or socio-economic settings of the villages made some of them more (or otherwise less) favourable for agricultural activities based on SAB. Most reported burns occurred in June and July. The three years with the maximum number of reported burns had a tendency to be wetter during these months when compared to the same period during an “average” year (p = 0.19). The pattern suggested that farmers preferred conducting burns during years with a below-average climatological fire hazard. An earlier start of the fire season favoured burning activity (p = 0.10 R2 = 0.33), while its later ending had no significant effect on the number of burns (p = 0.53). Our study documented strong climatic controls of SAB practices at the annual scale and their social controls at above-annual scales. These patterns emerged despite the common use of slash-and-burn to mitigate generally limited food availability in the northern Ural mountain region and likely conservative estimates of these practices in available records.

Funder

Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Paleontology,Plant Science,Archeology

Reference69 articles.

1. Aleinikov A (2017a) The population and transformation features of natural landscapes of the upper Pechora in the 15th–19th centuries. Russ J Ecosyst Ecol 2:1–16. https://doi.org/10.21685/2500-0578-2017-3-2(in Russian)

2. Aleinikov A (2017b) Forest fires and traditional land use in the Upper Pechora basin. Anthropog Transform Nat Environ 3:12–15 (in Russian)

3. Aleinikov AA (2019) The features of slash-and-burn agriculture in the North of Perm province at the end of the 19th century and the beginning of the 20th century from archival data. In: Savinetsky AB (ed) Ecosystems Dynamics in the Holocene (dedicated to the 100th anniversary of L.G. Dinesman): Proceedings of the 5th Russian Scientific Conference with International Participation, Moscow. Geological Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, pp 19–21 (in Russian)

4. Aleinikov AA (2021) Historical and Geographic factors of intactness of the primary dark coniferous forests of Northern Ural. Russ J For Sci 6:593–608. https://doi.org/10.31857/S0024114821060036

5. Aleinikov AA, Lisitsyna OV (in press) Archival Analysis of Slash-and-burn agricultures in the North Ural Mountains at the end of the Nineteenth Century. Human Ecology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3