Abstract
AbstractIn this paper we describe the basics of the measurement of human dignity at the individual level, as well as within social contexts such as teams and organizations. In accordance with the prevailing literature, we define human dignity as the unconditional belief in the intrinsic value of life. Based on this, we established a model that understands dignity as a latent construct by evaluating personal sense of worth as well as behaviors that either violate or honor such an intrinsic value in social contexts. We developed and tested a 3-factor measure of dignity. The first factor assessed a personal sense of dignity (individual level), the second the extent to which leadership honors dignity and how work teams themselves express dignity to their members. The third factor assessed the extent to which the organizational culture honors and protects the dignity of its members. We examined the internal reliability, temporal stability, convergent, divergent, and predictive validity of our scales and presented a psychometrically sound assessment tool of intrinsic value for organizations, teams, and individuals.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Strategy and Management,Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Business and International Management,Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous)
Reference23 articles.
1. Atkins, P.W.B., D.S. Wilson, and S.C. Hayes. 2019. Prosocial: Using evolutionary science to build productive, equitable, and collaborative groups. Oakland: New Harbinger Publications, Inc..
2. Bayles, M.D. 1978. The price of life. Ethics 89 (1): 20–34.
3. Brown, T.A., B.F. Chorpita, W. Korotitscw, and D.H. Barlow. 1997. Psychometric properties of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS) in clinical samples. Behaviour Research and Therapy 35: 79–89.
4. Costa, A.C., and N. Anderson. 2011. Measuring trust in teams: Development and validation of a multifaceted measure of formative and reflective indicators of team trust. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology 20: 119–154.
5. DeVellis, R.F., and C.T. Thorpe. 2021. Scale development: Theory and applications. Sage publications.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献