Author:
Hepach P,Bresinsky L,Sauter M,Livshitz Y,Engelhardt I
Abstract
AbstractKarst aquifers can be particularly vulnerable to human activities and climate change due to their relatively high degree of connection with the surface. This study utilized an ensemble of event-based recharge calculation methods to address the problem of structural uncertainty for the example of the Western Mountain Aquifer (WMA), a Mediterranean karst aquifer located in Israel and the West Bank. Spatially distributed recharge estimates derived from the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) and the process-based infiltration model (PIM) were compared to site-specific, empirical regression models. The SWAT and PIM mean annual recharge estimates ranged from 32–34.6% of precipitation, almost equating to the results of empirical regression models (32–36%). Future recharge predictions under the influence of climate change were quantified by parameterizing the SWAT and PIM methods with a downscaled regional climate model of Israel. SWAT predicts a 23% decrease in recharge by 2051–2070 relative to 1981–2001. In contrast, PIM shows a 9% decrease, possibly due to the representation of infiltration through preferential flow pathways and exclusion of surface runoff processes. These divergent projections underline key methodological differences in the representation of hydrological processes. Nevertheless, both methods effectively provided good estimates of groundwater recharge. The recharge rates estimated from the various methods were integrated into MODFLOW to assess their relative impacts on groundwater storage dynamics. The ensemble of MODFLOW projected groundwater storage outputs can provide guidance for sustainable groundwater management in the region.
Funder
Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
Technische Universität Berlin
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference56 articles.
1. Abusaada M, Sauter M (2017) Recharge Estimation in Karst Aquifers by Applying Water Level Fluctuation Approach. Int J Earth Sci Geophys 3(1). https://doi.org/10.35840/2631-5033/1813
2. Abusaada M, Sauter M (2013) Studying the flow dynamics of a karst aquifer system with an equivalent porous medium model. Groundwater 51(4):641–650. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6584.2012.01003.x
3. Abusaada MJ (2011) Flow Dynamics and Management Options in a Stressed Carbonate Aquifer System, The Western Aquifer Basin, Palestine [Georg-August-Universität zu Göttingen]. http://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-1735-0000-0006-B2FD-2
4. Adinolfi M, Remhi C, Mercogliano P, Remhi C (2020) MedWater project “ Sustainable management of politically and economically highly relevant water resources in hydraulically , climatically and ecologically highly dynamic carbonate ground-water aquifers of the Mediterranean ” Report I High-resolution clima
5. Al Khoury I, Boithias L, Labat D (2023) A Review of the Application of the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) in Karst Watersheds. In Water (Switzerland) (Vol. 15, Issue 5). MDPI. https://doi.org/10.3390/w15050954