Author:
Abdelrahman Moataz M. G.,Szabó Norbert P.
Abstract
AbstractA novel well-log-analysis approach is presented for an improved prediction of petrophysical properties in groundwater formations. Geophysical well logs are simultaneously processed for quantifying the lithology, storage capacity, and water flow parameters. A fully automated data processing workflow is proposed, the feasibility of which is assured by an appropriate starting model set by the joint application of factor analysis and the Hurst exponent, and a solution of a highly overdetermined inverse problem. The Hurst exponent is used for zone boundary detection, which assists the series expansion-based interval inversion method applied for estimation of the petrophysical parameters of clastic formations. The hydraulic conductivity as a well log is directly derived from the inversion results. The workflow is tested using both synthetic data contaminated with 5% Gaussian distributed noise and real data collected from a thermal water well in Baktalórántháza, eastern Hungary. At the test site, the Hurst exponent extracted from the wireline logs allows one to divide the processed interval into subzones around the Pleistocene-Miocene boundary. The observed wireline logs are inverted to estimate the volumetric parameters (porosity, shale content, water saturation, etc.) of the same zones. The predicted parameters, including hydraulic conductivity, reveal that Pleistocene sediments contain good aquifers with formation quality varying with depth. The shale volume and hydraulic conductivity logs show a proper match with the core data, which confirms the results of the comprehensive analysis. The suggested workflow is recommended for the evaluation of groundwater formations located in different depth domains, from unsaturated sediments to geothermal reservoirs.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous),Water Science and Technology
Reference40 articles.
1. Alberty M, Hashmy K (1984) Application of ULTRA to log analysis. SPWLA 25th Annual Logging Symposium, New Orleans, LA, June 1984, pp 1–17
2. Alger RP (1971) Interpretation of electric logs in fresh water wells in unconsolidated formations. SPE Reprint Series 1, SPE, Richardson, TX
3. Amaefule JO, Altunbay M, Tiab D, Kersey DG, Keelan DK (1993) Enhanced reservoir description: using core and log data to identify hydraulic (flow) units and predict permeability in uncored intervals/wells. Proceedings - SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition Omega, pp 205–220. https://doi.org/10.2118/26436-MS
4. Archie GE (1952) Classification of carbonate reservoir rocks and petrophysical considerations. AAPG Bull 36(2):218–298. https://doi.org/10.1306/3D9343F7-16B1-11D7-8645000102C1865D
5. Asquith G, Krygowski D (2006) Basic well log analysis, Second edition. AAPG Methods in Exploration Series 16, AAPG, Tulsa, OK