Abstract
AbstractThe Member States of the European Union pledged to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 80–95% by 2050. Shallow geothermal systems might substantially contribute by providing heating and cooling in a sustainable way through seasonally storing heat and cold in the shallow ground (<200 m). When the minimum yield associated with the installation of a cost-effective aquifer thermal energy storage (ATES) system cannot be met, borehole thermal energy storage, relying mostly on the thermal conductivity of the ground, is proposed. However, for large-scale applications, this requires the installation of hundreds of boreholes, which entails a large cost and high disturbance of the underground. In such cases, ATES systems can nevertheless become interesting. This paper presents a case study performed on a Ghent University campus (Belgium), where the feasibility of ATES in an area with a low transmissivity was determined. The maximum yield of the aquifer was estimated at 5 m3/h through pumping tests. Although this low yield was attributed to the fine grain size of the aquifer, membrane filtering index tests and long-term injection tests revealed that the clogging risk was limited. A groundwater model was used to optimize the well placement. It was shown that a well arrangement in a checkerboard pattern was most effective to optimize the hydraulic efficiency while maintaining the thermal recovery efficiency of the ATES system. Hence, for large-scale projects, efficient thermal energy storage can also be achieved using a (more cost-effective) ATES system even in low-permeability sediments.
Funder
Ghent University Special Research Fund
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous),Water Science and Technology
Reference54 articles.
1. Aalten T, Witteveen H (2015) Protocol zand- en slibhoudendheidsmetingen, versie 1.0. BodemenergieNL [Protocol for sand and silt content measurements, version 1.0. Soil energyNL]. https://docplayer.nl/48776639-Protocol-zand-en-slibhoudendheidsmetingen.html. Accessed May 19, 2022
2. Abuasbeh M, Acuña J (2018) ATES system monitoring project, first measurement and performance evaluation: case study in Sweden. IGSHPA Research Track. https://shareok.org. Accessed September 8, 2022
3. Batac KIT, Collera AA, Villanueva RO, Agaton CB (2022) Decision support for investments in sustainable energy sources under uncertainties. Int J Renew Ener Dev 11(3):801–814. https://doi.org/10.14710/ijred.2022.45913
4. Bayer P, Saner D, Bolay S, Rybach L, Blum P (2012) Greenhouse gas emission savings of ground source heat pump systems in Europe: a review. Renew Sustain Ener Rev 16:1256–1267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2011.09.027
5. Bedekar V, Morway ED, Langevin CD, Tonkin M (2016) MT3D-USGS version 1.0.0: Groundwater Solute Transport Simulator for MODFLOW. US Geological Survey Software Release, 30 September 2016. https://doi.org/10.5066/F75T3HKD. Accessed May 19, 2022