Abstract
AbstractHyporheic exchange flow (HEF) at the streambed–water interface (SWI) has been shown to impact the pattern and rate of discharging groundwater flow (GWF) and the consequential transport of heat, solutes and contaminants from the subsurface into streams. However, the control of geographic and hydromorphological catchment characteristics on GWF–HEF interactions is still not fully understood. Here, the spatial variability in flow characteristics in discharge zones was investigated and averaged over three spatial scales in five geographically different catchments in Sweden. Specifically, the deep GWF discharge velocity at the SWI was estimated using steady-state numerical models, accounting for the real multiscale topography and heterogeneous geology, while an analytical model, based on power spectral analysis of the streambed topography and statistical assessments of the stream hydraulics, was used to estimate the HEF. The modeling resulted in large variability in deep GWF and HEF velocities, both within and between catchments, and a regression analysis was performed to explain this observed variability by using a set of independent variables representing catchment topography and geology as well as local stream hydromorphology. Moreover, the HEF velocity was approximately two orders of magnitude larger than the deep GWF velocity in most of the investigated stream reaches, indicating significant potential to accelerate the deep GWF velocity and reduce the discharge areas. The greatest impact occurred in catchments with low average slope and in reaches close to the catchment outlet, where the deep GWF discharge velocity was generally low.
Funder
Strålsäkerhetsmyndigheten
Royal Institute of Technology
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous),Water Science and Technology
Reference65 articles.
1. Abelin H, Birgersson L, Moreno L, Widén H, Ågren T, Neretnieks I (1991) Large-scale flow and tracer experiment in granite 2: results and interpretation. Water Resour Res 27(12):3119–3135
2. Alexander WR, Smith PA, Mckinley IG (2003) Modelling radionuclide transport in the geological environment: a case study from the field of radioactive waste disposal, chap 5. In: Scott EM (ed) Radioactivity in the environment. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 109–145
3. Bhaskar AS, Harvey JW, Henry EJ (2012) Resolving hyporheic and groundwater components of streambed water flux using heat as a tracer. Water Resour Res 48(8). https://doi.org/10.1029/2011wr011784
4. Boano F, Revelli R, Ridolfi L (2008) Reduction of the hyporheic zone volume due to the stream-aquifer interaction. Geophys Res Lett 35:1–5
5. Boano F, Harvey JW, Marion A, Packman AI, Revelli R, Ridolfi L, Wörman A (2014) Hyporheic flow and transport processes: mechanisms, models, and biogeochemical implications. Water Resour Res 52:603–679
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献