Abstract
AbstractThe parameterization of spatially distributed hydraulic properties is one of the most crucial steps in groundwater modeling. A common approach is to estimate hydraulic properties at a set of pilot points and interpolate the values at each model cell. Despite the popularity of this method, several questions remain about the optimum number and distribution of pilot points, which are determining factors for the efficiency of the method. This study proposes a strategy for optimal pilot point parameterization that minimizes the number of parameters while maximizing the assimilation of an observed dataset unevenly distributed in space. The performance of different pilot point distributions has been compared with a synthetic groundwater model, considering regular grids of pilot points with different spacings and adaptive grids with different refinement criteria. This work considered both prior and iterative refinements, with a parameter estimation step between successive refinements. The parameter estimation was conducted with the Gauss–Levenberg–Marquardt algorithm, and the strategies were ranked according to the number of model calls to reach the target objective function. The strategy leading to the best fit with the measurement dataset at the minimum computational burden is an adaptive grid of pilot points with prior refinement based on measurement density. This strategy was successfully implemented on a regional, multilayered groundwater flow model in the south-western geological basin of France.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous),Water Science and Technology
Reference50 articles.
1. Ackerer P, Trottier N, Delay F (2014) Flow in double-porosity aquifers: parameter estimation using an adaptive multiscale method. Adv Water Resour 73:108–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2014.07.001
2. Alcolea A, Carrera J, Medina A (2006) Pilot points method incorporating prior information for solving the groundwater flow inverse problem. Adv Water Resour 29:1678–1689. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2005.12.009
3. Anderson MP, Woessner WW, Hunt RJ (2015) Applied groundwater modeling: simulation of flow and advective transport. Academic. https://doi.org/10.1016/C2009-0-21563-7.
4. Baalousha HM, Fahs M, Ramasomanana F, Younes A (2019) Effect of pilot-points location on model calibration: application to the northern karst aquifer of Qatar. Water 11:679. https://doi.org/10.3390/w11040679
5. Buscarlet E, Cabaret O, Saltel M (2019) Gestion des eaux souterraines en Région Aquitaine - Développements et maintenance du Modèle Nord-Aquitain de gestion des nappes - Modules 1.1 & 1.2 - Année 2. Rapport final. BRGM/RP-68863-FR, 57 p., 33 ill., 7 tabl., 2 ann. [Groundwater management in the Aquitaine Region: development and maintenance of the North-Aquitain model of groundwater management—Module 1.1, Year 2. Final report. BRGM/RP-68863-FR, 57 p., 33 illustrations, 7 tables. 2 annals.]