Abstract
AbstractChildren’s multiplicative thinking as the recognition of equal group structures and the enumeration of the composite units was the subject of this research. In this paper, we provide an overview of the Multiplication and Division Investigations project. The results were obtained from a small sample of Australian children (n = 21) in their first year of school (mean age 5 years 6 months) who participated in a teaching experiment of five lessons taught by their classroom teacher. The tasks introduced children to the “equal groups” aspect of multiplication. A theoretical framework of constructivist learning, together with research literature underpinning early multiplicative thinking, tasks, and children’s thinking, was used to design the research. Our findings indicate that young children could imagine equal group structures and, in doing so, recognise and enumerate composite units. As the children came to these tasks without any prior formal instruction, it seemed that they had intuitive understandings of equal group structures based on their life experiences. We argue that the implications for teaching include creating learning provocations that elicit children’s early ideas of multiplication, visualisation, and abstraction. The research has also shown the importance of observing children, listening to their explanations of their thinking, and using insights provided by their drawings.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Education,General Mathematics
Reference65 articles.
1. Ames, C. (1992). Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 261–271. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.84.3.261
2. Anghileri, J. (1989). An investigation of young children’s understanding of multiplication. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 20, 367–385.
3. Anghileri, J. (2006). Children’s mathematical thinking in the primary years: Perspectives on children’s learning. Continuum.
4. Askew, A. (2018). Multiplicative reasoning: Teaching primary pupils in ways that focus on functional relations. The Curriculum Journal, 29(3), 406–423. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585176.2018.1433545
5. Australian Curriculum Assessment and Reporting Authority (ACARA). (2013). The shape of the Australian Curriculum version 4.0. Sydney, NSW: ACARA.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献