How current perspectives on algorithmic thinking can be applied to students’ engagement in algorithmatizing tasks

Author:

Lehmann Timothy H.ORCID

Abstract

AbstractThe aim of this study is to examine how algorithmatizing tasks engage mathematics students in algorithmic thinking. Structured, task-based interviews were conducted with eight Year 12 students as they completed a sequence of algorithmatizing tasks involving maximum flow problems. A deductive-inductive analytical process was used to first classify students’ mathematical behavior according to four cognitive skills of algorithmic thinking (decomposition, abstraction, algorithmization, and debugging) and then develop sets of subskills to describe how the students engaged these cognitive skills. The findings show how students used algorithmic thinking to solve maximum flow problems and then made progress towards creating a general algorithm before being introduced to the maximum-flow minimum-cut approach, which guarantees a solution.

Funder

Queensland University of Technology

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Education,General Mathematics

Reference46 articles.

1. Australian Curriculum Assessment and Reporting Authority. (2022). Australian Curriculum: Mathematics v.9. ACARA. Retrieved October 22, 2022, from https://v9.australiancurriculum.edu.au/

2. Carruthers, S., Milford, T., Pelton, T., & Stege, U. (2011, June 27–29). Draw a social network [Paper presentation]. 16th Annual Joint Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education, Darmstadt, Germany. https://doi.org/10.1145/1999747.1999799

3. Chen, L., Kyng, R., Liu, Y. P., Peng, R., Gutenberg, M. P., & Sachdeva, S. (2022). Maximum flow and minimum-cost flow in almost-linear time [Paper presentation]. IEEE 63rd Annual Symposium on Foundation of Computer Science, Denver, CO, United States.

4. Clements, J. (2000). Analysis of clinical interviews: Foundations and model viability. In A. E. Kelly & R. A. Lesh (Eds.), Handbook of research design in mathematics and science education (pp. 547–589). Lawrence Erlbaum.

5. Corbin, J. M., & Strauss, A. L. (2015). Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3