Exploring the challenges of learning quadratic equations and reflecting upon curriculum structure and implementation

Author:

Reid O’Connor BronwynORCID,Norton Stephen

Abstract

Abstract An important topic of study in secondary mathematics is non-linear functions, including quadratic equations. In this study, findings from 25 Year 11 students indicated that difficulties with critical prerequisite concepts such as algebraic conventions impeded students’ success in understanding and working with quadratics. Analysis of student errors identified misconceptions associated with the null factor law, and the nature of quadratic equations. This paper proposes that these findings are a result of limited timeframes nominated for learning quadratic topics outlined in the enacted curriculum. The implication of this is that the enactment of the Australian Curriculum: Mathematics F-10 did not support the development of conceptual understanding or procedural fluency with key mathematical concepts for these students. Without purposeful attention to prerequisite knowledge, and suitable time allocated to develop understanding and fluency, students’ proficiency with topics such as quadratics is negatively influenced. A mastery approach to the hierarchically organised curriculum is supported by findings of this study.

Funder

University of Sydney

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Education,General Mathematics

Reference63 articles.

1. Adey, P., & Shayer, M. (2013). Piagetian approaches. In J. Hattie & E. Anderman (Eds.), International Guide to Student Achievement (pp. 28–30). New York.

2. Ashlock, R. B. (1976). Error patterns in computation (2nd ed.). Merrill.

3. Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority. (2012). My school. Retrieved July 4, 2013, from: http://www.myschool.edu.au

4. Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority. (2018). Mathematics curriculum v8.4. Retrieved from 2 Nov 2016, Australian Curriculum: http://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/mathematics/curriculum/f-10?layout=1

5. Bloom, B. (1968). Learning for Mastery. Evaluation Comment, 1(2), 1–5.

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Innovation Learning with POE: Improve Understanding Student to Equality Square;Journal of Educational Technology and Learning Creativity;2024-06-23

2. Development of Three Tier Online Test Diagnostic of Misconception for Topic Free Fall Motion;Schrödinger: Journal of Physics Education;2024-06-22

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3