Application of objective clinical human reliability analysis (OCHRA) in assessment of technical performance in laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery: common mistakes and methodological issues-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Application of objective clinical human reliability analysis (OCHRA) in assessment of technical performance in laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery: common mistakes and methodological issues

Published:2016-11-16 Issue:5 Volume:21 Page:401-402
ISSN:1123-6337
Container-title:Techniques in Coloproctology
language:en
Short-container-title:Tech Coloproctol

Author:

Sabour S.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Gastroenterology,Surgery

Link

http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10151-016-1540-5/fulltext.html

Reference5 articles.

1. Foster JD, Miskovic D, Allison AS et al (2016) Application of objective clinical human reliability analysis (OCHRA) in assessment of technical performance in laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery. Tech Coloproctol 20:361–367

2. Lin LI (1989) A concordance correlation coefficient to evaluate reproducibility. Biometrics 45:255–268

3. Sabour S (2016) Reliability of a new modified tear breakup time method: methodological and statistical issues. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 254:595–596

4. Sabour S (2014) Reproducibility of dynamic Scheimpflug-based pneumotonometer and its correlation with a dynamic bidirectional pneumotonometry device: methodological issues. Cornea 34:e14–e15

5. Sabour S (2014) Accuracy and reproducibility of dental measurements using different technologies, methodologic mistake. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 145:549–550

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Ergonomic Reliability Assessment for Operation Process of Medical Device Interface Design Based on OAT and CREAM;IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering;2021-01-01

2. Application of objective clinical human reliability analysis (OCHRA) in assessment of technical performance in laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery: common mistakes and methodological issues;Techniques in Coloproctology;2017-05