Abstract
AbstractIn this paper, we devise a stochastic asset–liability management (ALM) model for a life insurance company and analyze its influence on the balance sheet within a low-interest rate environment. In particular, a flexible procedure for the generation of insurers’ compressed contract portfolios that respects the given biometric structure is presented, extending the existing literature on stochastic ALM modeling. The introduced balance sheet model is in line with the principles of double-entry bookkeeping as required in accounting. We further focus on the incorporation of new business, i.e. the addition of newly concluded contracts and thus of insured in each period. Efficient simulations are obtained by integrating new policies into existing cohorts according to contract-related criteria. We provide new results on the consistency of the balance sheet equations. In extensive simulation studies for different scenarios regarding the business form of today’s life insurers, we utilize these to analyze the long-term behavior and the stability of the components of the balance sheet for different asset–liability approaches. Finally, we investigate the robustness of two prominent investment strategies against crashes in the capital markets, which lead to extreme liquidity shocks and thus threaten the insurer’s financial health.
Funder
Technische Universität Kaiserslautern
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty,Economics and Econometrics,Statistics and Probability
Reference21 articles.
1. Bauer D, Kiesel R, Kling A, Ruß J (2006) Risk-neutral valuation of participating life insurance contracts. Insur Math Econ 39(2):171–183
2. Bodie Z, Marcus AJ, Merton RC (1988) Defined benefit versus defined contribution pension plans: what are the real trade-offs? In: Pensions in the US economy. University of Chicago Press, pp 139–162
3. Bohnert A, Gatzert N (2012) Analyzing surplus appropriation schemes in participating life insurance from the insurer’s and the policyholder’s perspective. Insur Math Econ 50(1):64–78
4. Bohnert A, Gatzert N, Jørgensen PL (2015) On the management of life insurance company risk by strategic choice of product mix, investment strategy and surplus appropriation schemes. Insur Math Econ 60:83–97
5. Burkhart T, Reuß A, Zwiesler HJ (2015) Participating life insurance contracts under Solvency II: inheritance effects and allowance for a going concern reserve. Eur Actuar J 5(2):203–244
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献