A multi-task network approach for calculating discrimination-free insurance prices

Author:

Lindholm Mathias,Richman Ronald,Tsanakas AndreasORCID,Wüthrich Mario V.

Abstract

AbstractIn applications of predictive modeling, such as insurance pricing, indirect or proxy discrimination is an issue of major concern. Namely, there exists the possibility that protected policyholder characteristics are implicitly inferred from non-protected ones by predictive models and are thus having an undesirable (and possibly illegal) impact on prices. A technical solution to this problem relies on building a best-estimate model using all policyholder characteristics (including protected ones) and then averaging out the protected characteristics for calculating individual prices. However, such an approach requires full knowledge of policyholders’ protected characteristics, which may in itself be problematic. Here, we address this issue by using a multi-task neural network architecture for claim predictions, which can be trained using only partial information on protected characteristics and produces prices that are free from proxy discrimination. We demonstrate the proposed method on both synthetic data and a real-world motor claims dataset, in which proxy discrimination can be observed. In both examples we find that the predictive accuracy of the multi-task network is comparable to a conventional feed-forward neural network, when the protected information is available for at least half of the insurance policies. However, the multi-task network has superior performance in the case when the protected information is known for less than half of the insurance policyholders.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty,Economics and Econometrics,Statistics and Probability

Reference26 articles.

1. Abbas A, Sutter D, Zoufal C, Lucchi A, Figalli A, Woerner S (2021) The power of quantum neural networks. Nat Comput Sci 1:403–409

2. Araiza Iturria CA, Hardy M, Marriott P (2022) A discrimination-free premium under a causal framework. SSRN Manuscript ID 4079068

3. Batista GEAPA, Monard MC (2002) A study of $$k$$-nearest neighbour as an imputation method. In: Abraham A, Ruiz-del-Solar J, Köppen M (eds) Soft computing systems—design, management and applications, Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications, vol 87. IOS Press, Amsterdam, pp 251–260

4. Buolamwini J, Gebru T (2018) Gender shades: intersectional accuracy disparities in commercial gender classification. In: Conference on fairness, accountability and transparency, proceedings of machine learning research, vol 81, pp 77–91

5. Chaudhuri A, Christofides TC (2013) Indirect questioning in sample surveys. Springer, Berlin

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Fairness: plurality, causality, and insurability;European Actuarial Journal;2024-06-19

2. What is fair? Proxy discrimination vs. demographic disparities in insurance pricing;Scandinavian Actuarial Journal;2024-06-18

3. Enhancing actuarial non-life pricing models via transformers;European Actuarial Journal;2024-06-12

4. Big data, risk classification, and privacy in insurance markets;The Geneva Risk and Insurance Review;2024-03

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3