Abstract
AbstractThis commentary addresses the concept of learning stemming from Eva Jablonka and Simona Ginsburg’s theory of the emergence of consciousness. Jablonka and Ginsburg find strong support in biosemiotics for their argument that learning offers an evolutionary transition marker for the emergence of consciousness. Indeed, biosemiotics embraces a view on evolution that integrates both phylogeny and ontogeny. It does not polarize learning and evolving. At the same time, Jablonka and Ginsburg’s argument gives both biosemiotics and learning theory a shake, forcing scholarship in these fields to tackle difficult questions on agency, selfhood, consciousness and anthropological difference. I explore some of the main questions that arise from this theoretical development, particularly in reference to Andrew Stables’ semiotic learning theory, which has been easily nested in a biosemiotic framework.
Funder
Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
RWTH Aachen University
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Social Sciences (miscellaneous),Language and Linguistics,Communication
Reference49 articles.
1. Campbell, C., Olteanu, A., & Kull, K. (2019). Learning and knowing as semiosis: Extending the conceptual apparatus of semiotics. Sign Systems Studies, 47(3/4), 352–381
2. Campbell, C., Olteanu, A., & Feil, S. (2021). Peircean anti-psychologism and learning theory. Chinese Semiotic Studies, 17(1), 175–197
3. Cobley, P. (2016). Cultural implication of biosemiotics. Cham: Springer
4. Cobley, P., & Stjernfelt, F. (2015). Scaffolding development and the human condition. Biosemiotics, 8, 291–304.
5. Clowes, R. W., K. Gärtner, I. Hipólito. (2021). Eds. The mind-technology problem: Investigating minds, selves and 21st Century artefacts. Cham: Springer.
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献