Author:
Delliponti Angelo,Raia Renato,Sanguedolce Giulia,Gutowski Adam,Pleyer Michael,Sibierska Marta,Placiński Marek,Żywiczyński Przemysław,Wacewicz Sławomir
Abstract
AbstractExperimental Semiotics (ES) is the study of novel forms of communication that communicators develop in laboratory tasks whose designs prevent them from using language. Thus, ES relates to pragmatics in a “pure,” radical sense, capturing the process of creating the relation between signs and their interpreters as biological, psychological, and social agents. Since such a creation of meaning-making from scratch is of central importance to language evolution research, ES has become the most prolific experimental approach in this field of research. In our paper, we report the results of a study on the scope of recent ES and evaluate the ways in which it is relevant to the study of language origins. We coded for multiple levels across 13 dimensions related to the properties of the emergent communication systems or properties of the study designs, such as type of goal (coordination versus referential), modality of communication, absence or presence of turn-taking, or the presence of vertical vs. horizontal transmission. We discuss our findings and our classification, focusing on the advantages and limitations of those trends in ES, and in particular their ecological validity in the context of bootstrapping communication and the evolution of language.
Funder
Polish National Science Centre
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Social Sciences (miscellaneous),Language and Linguistics,Communication
Reference54 articles.
1. Bar-On, D. (2021). How to do things with nonwords: Pragmatics, biosemantics, and origins of language in animal communication. Biology & Philosophy, 36(6), 1–25.
2. Bartlett, F. C. (1932). Remembering. A study in experimental and social psychology. Cam- bridge University Press.
3. Bavelas, A. (1950). Communication patterns in task-oriented groups. The Journal of the Acous- tical Society of America, 22(6), 725–730.
4. Bavelas, A. (1952). Communication patterns in problem-solving groups. In H. von Foerster (Ed.), Cybernetics. Circular causal and feedback mechanisms in biological and social sys- tems. Transactions of the ninth conference (pp. 1–44). Josiah Macy Jr. Foundation New York, NY.
5. Blokpoel, M., van Kesteren, M., Stolk, A., Haselager, P., Toni, I., & Van Rooij, I. (2012). Recipient design in human communication: Simple heuristics or perspective taking? Frontiers in human neuroscience, 6, 253.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献