Abstract
AbstractThis paper explores a semiotic notion of body as starting point for bridging biosemiotic with social semiotic theory. The cornerstone of the argument is that the social semiotic criticism of the classic view of meaning as double articulation can support the criticism of language-centrism that lies at the foundation of biosemiotics. Besides the pragmatic epistemological advantages implicit in a theoretical synthesis, I argue that this brings a semiotic contribution to philosophy of mind broadly. Also, it contributes to overcoming the polemic in linguistics between, loosely put, cognitive universalism and cultural relativism. This possibility is revealed by the recent convergence of various semiotic theories towards a criticism of the classic notion of meaning as double articulation. In biosemiotics, the interest to explicate meaning as multiply articulated stems from the construal of Umwelt as relying on the variety of sense perception channels and semiotic systems that a species has at its disposal. Recently, social semiotics developed an unexplored interest for embodiment by starting from the other end, namely the consideration of the modal heterogeneity of meaning. To bridge these notions, I employ the cognitive semantic notion of embodiment and Mittelberg’s cognitive semiotic notion of exbodiment. In light of these, I explore the possible intricacies between the biosemiotic notion of primary modeling system and concepts referring to preconceptual structures for knowledge organization stemming from cognitive linguistics. Further, Mittelberg’s concept of exbodiment allows for a construal of meaning articulation as mediation between the exbodying and embodying directions of mind.
Funder
Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
RWTH Aachen University
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Social Sciences (miscellaneous),Language and Linguistics,Communication
Reference84 articles.
1. Alcock, J. (2001). The triumph of sociobiology. Oxford University Press.
2. Bakhtin, M.M. (2008 [1981]). The dialogic imagination: Four essays. Trans. Emerson, C., Holquist, M. : University of Texas Press.
3. Barthes, R. (1977). Image Music Text. Fontana Press.
4. Benedict, R. (1934). Patterns of Culture. Houghton Mifflin Company.
5. Bernstein, B. (1960). Language and social class. The British Journal of Sociology, 11(3), 271–276.
Cited by
8 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献