Abstract
AbstractBacterial chemotaxis is often considered to be a textbook example of the rudimentary semiotic process. As such, it gives an excellent opportunity to better understand both semiosis and biology. Our study reviews this phenomenon in the light of up-to-date scientific knowledge to answer the most basic semiotic questions: what is the sign? What types of signs are there? What is the meaning understood on the molecular level, and by what means can it grow with time? As a case study, the bacterial chemotaxis toward glucose in E. coli species is chosen, and the semiotic framework of Charles Sanders Peirce applied. The analyses provide us with the following results: the sign, in its ultimate nature, is a general process. Bacterial chemotaxis can be understood in terms of Peircean type, symbol, and argument. The meaning on the molecular level is entirely pragmatic and, in this case, reduced to a bacterial response to glucose. A sign can grow through sign generalization, the emergence of different sign categories, the integration of these categories in functional cycles, and the introduction of contextuality. The sign of bacterial chemotaxis extends from the cell signaling pathways up to the population level. The presented results advance our knowledge of sign processing in the context of semiotic evolution.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Social Sciences (miscellaneous),Language and Linguistics,Communication
Reference70 articles.
1. Adler, J., Hazelbauer, G. L., & Dahl, M. M. (1973). Chemotaxis toward sugars in Escherichia coli. Journal of Bacteriology, 115(3), 824–847. https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.115.3.824-847.1973
2. Atkin, A. (2013). Peirce’s Theory of Signs. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2013/entries/peirce-semiotics/.
3. Bansal, T., Englert, D., Lee, J., Hegde, M., Wood, T. K., & Jayaraman, A. (2007). Differential effects of epinephrine, norepinephrine, and indole on Escherichia coli O157:H7 chemotaxis, colonization, and gene expression. Infection and Immunity, 75(9), 4597–4607. https://doi.org/10.1128/IAI.00630-07
4. Bansal, T., Jesudhasan, P., Pillai, S., Wood, T. K., & Jayaraman, A. (2008). Temporal regulation of enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli virulence mediated by autoinducer-2. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 78(5), 811–819. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-008-1359-8
5. Bardy, S. L., Briegel, A., Rainville, S., & Krell, T. (2017). Recent advances and future prospects in bacterial and archaeal locomotion and signal transduction. Journal of Bacteriology, 199(18), e00203-e217. https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.00203-17
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献