Abstract
AbstractEvaluating reservoir performance could be challenging, especially when available data are only limited to pressures and rates from oil field production and/or injection wells. Numerical simulation is a typical approach to estimate reservoir properties using the history match process by reconciling field observations and model predictions. Performing numerical simulations can be computationally expensive by considering a large number of grids required to capture the spatial variation in geological properties, detailed structural complexity of the reservoir, and numerical time steps to cover different periods of oil recovery. In this work, a simplified physics-based model is used to estimate specific reservoir parameters during CO2 storage into a depleted oil reservoir. The governing equation is based on the integrated capacitance resistance model algorithm. A multivariate linear regression method is used for estimating reservoir parameters (injectivity index and compressibility). Synthetic scenarios were generated using a multiphase flow numerical simulator. Then, the results of the simplified physics-based model in terms of the estimated fluid compressibility were compared against the simulation results. CO2 injection data including bottom hole pressure and injection rate were also gathered from a depleted oil reef in Michigan Basin. A field application of the simplified physics-based model was presented to estimate above-mentioned parameters for the case of CO2 storage in a depleted oil reservoir in Michigan Basin. The results of this work show that this simple lumped parameter model can be used for a quick estimation of the specific reservoir parameters and its changes over the CO2 injection period.
Funder
Midwest Regional Carbon Sequestration Partnership
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Energy,Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology
Reference58 articles.
1. Albertoni A, Lake LW (2003) Inferring interwell connectivity only from well-rate fluctuations in waterfloods. SPE Reserv Eval Eng 6:6–16
2. Alvarado V, Manrique E (2010) Enhanced oil recovery: an update review. Energies 3:1529–1575
3. Bachu S, Bonijoly D, Bradshaw J, Burruss R, Holloway S, Christensen NP, Mathiassen OM (2007) CO2 storage capacity estimation. Methodol Gaps Int J Greenh Gas Control 1:430–443
4. Bastami A, Delshad M, Pourafshari P (2012a) Rapid estimation of water flooding performance and optimization in EOR by using capacitance resistive model
5. Bastami A, Delshad M, Pourafshary P (2012) Rapid estimation of water flooding performance and optimization in EOR by using capacitance resistive model. IranJ Chem Eng 9:3–16