Abstract
AbstractThe upper part of the sedimentary cover within the East Siberian Sea shelf comprises Cenozoic clinoform deposits, which accumulated in passive continental margin settings. In the Eastern Arctic, the productivity of clinoform deposits has been proved on the Alaska North Slope and in the Beaufort–Mackenzie Basin. Considering that Cenozoic clinoform deposits are widely represented in the Russian part of the Eastern Arctic, they undoubtedly attract considerable interest from the standpoint of hydrocarbons prospecting. However, despite increasingly closer attention to this interval of the sedimentary section, it is still poorly understood due to its complicated geology. The lack of drilled wells in the region imposes a considerable limitation on an understanding of sedimentary basins development. In this situation, geophysical data become the primary source of information for building geologic models in the Russian sector of the Eastern Arctic. An assessment of hypothetical Cenozoic petroleum systems of the East Siberian Sea is the main objective of this paper. It is to be said research performed under high uncertainty of input data. The results obtained from basin analysis and numerical modeling indicate the possibility that an active petroleum system may exist in the Cenozoic sedimentary wedge of the East Siberian Sea. The outlook for the clinoform complex largely depends on the source rock maturity, i.e., higher prospects should be expected in areas where the prograding wedge has maximum thickness. Considering all factors (reservoir quality prediction, proximity to a hydrocarbon kitchen, timing), the Eocene–Oligocene part of the sedimentary section appears to offer the greatest promise within the study area. Here, predominantly oil accumulations may be expected at a depth of 2.5–3.5 km below sea bottom.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Energy,Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology
Reference27 articles.
1. Bhattacharya S, Verma S (2020) Seismic attribute and petrophysics-assisted interpretation of the Nanushuk and Torok Formations on the North Slope. Alaska Interpretation 8(2):1–18. https://doi.org/10.1190/INT-2019-0112.1
2. Bird KJ, Houseknecht DW (2011) Geology and petroleum potential of the Arctic Alaska petroleum province, chap. 32 of Spencer. In: Embry AM, Gautier DL, Stoupakova AV, Sorensen K (eds) Arctic petroleum geology: The Geological Society of London, Memoir 35: 485–499. https://doi.org/10.1144/M35.32
3. Botterell PJ, Houseknecht DW, Lillis PG et al (2021) Geochemical advances in Arctic Alaska oil typing—North Slope oil correlation and charge history. Mar Pet Geol 127:1–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2020.104878
4. Chmielowski J, Pikka‐Horseshoe, Willow, Smith Bay (2018) Unraveling Three New Discoveries with Publicly Available Data. https://dog.dnr.alaska.gov/documents/resourceevaluation/01_ags_luncheon_presentation_04-24-18.pdf
5. Freiman SI, Nikishin AM, Petrov EI (2019) Cenozoic Clinoform complexes and the Geological History of the North Chukchi Basin (Chuckchi Sea, Arctic). Mosc Univ Geol Bull 74(5):441–449. https://doi.org/10.3103/S0145875219050053
Cited by
8 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献