A review of cement sheath integrity evaluation techniques for carbon dioxide storage

Author:

Udebhulu Okhiria D.ORCID,Aladeitan Yetunde,Azevedo Ricardo C.,De Tomi Giorgio

Abstract

AbstractCement sheath integrity is a critical concern in the successful implementation of geologic carbon capture and storage (CCS) projects. Conventional ordinary Portland cement (OPC) is not thermodynamically compatible with the carbon dioxide (CO2) present in CO2 storage media. When OPC cement sheaths interact with aqueous CO2, they undergo degradation, producing calcium bicarbonate. This bicarbonate readily dissolves in the formation aquifer and can create leakage pathways, compromising the integrity of the wellbores. This study comprehensively reviews the state-of-the-art techniques for evaluating cement sheath integrity, providing a comprehensive compendium of available methods in a single article. The paper’s objective is to support the deployment of successful CCS projects, facilitate the remediation of affected wellbores in CO2 storage systems, and offer guidelines for evaluating improved cement slurry designs and formulations. Additionally, the study identifies the factors that influence cement sheath integrity when exposed to aqueous CO2, including in-situ temperature and pressure, reservoir fluid characteristics, cement slurry formulations, and wellbore operations. Furthermore, various modes of mechanical failure in cement sheaths are identified, such as radial cracking, plastic deformation, inner and outer debonding, and channeling. Understanding these failure mechanisms is crucial for designing robust cementing strategies in CCS applications. Evaluation techniques for assessing the integrity of cement sheaths exposed to aqueous CO2 encompass a range of approaches. These include direct experimentation with samples that mimic the in -situ conditions of storage sites, well logging for monitoring leakages, analytical, numerical, and statistical modeling, and risk assessments. Direct experimentation plays a vital role in understanding the carbonation kinetics and changes in cement sheaths' mechanical and transport properties. Techniques such as scanning electron microscopy, back-scattered electron image detectors, energy-dispersive spectroscopy, mercury intrusion porosimetry, optical microscopy, X-ray diffraction, electrical resistivity imaging, electron probe microanalyzers, inductivity-coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry, X-ray computed microtomography, Raman spectroscopy, direct image correlation, and particle velocimetry are utilized for direct experimentation. Analytical and numerical modeling approaches include reactive transport modeling, multi-scale modeling, computational fluid dynamics (CFD), and artificial intelligence (AI)-based modeling. In field operations, the integrity of the cement sheaths can be evaluated using cement bond evaluation tools, pressure transient test tools, cement coring tools, or sustained casing pressure analysis. These techniques collectively enable a comprehensive assessment of the integrity of cement sheath exposed to aqueous CO2, aiding in optimizing and monitoring carbon storage systems. Every CO2 storage medium is unique. Optimal assessment of the cement sheaths' integrity of its wellbore systems, when exposed to aqueous CO2, would require a different combination of suitable evaluation techniques. Future studies should focus on developing standardized guidelines that combine laboratory testing, field-scale testing, and numerical modeling to predict the evolution of cement sheath integrity when exposed to aqueous CO2. Additional research is necessary to determine the optimal combinations of cement additives that enhance long-term resilience and resistance to carbonic acid attacks, enabling successful geologic sequestration. Furthermore, there are ample research opportunities to advance numerical modeling techniques for evaluating the effects of aqueous CO2 on cement sheath integrity and identifying potential failure mechanisms.

Funder

Petroleum Technology Development Fund

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

General Energy,Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3