Abstract
AbstractDrilling in Barents Sea proves to be a challenging task, as this region is situated in auroral zones having high geomagnetic latitude, where magnetic interferences develop from magnetic field and magnetic materials inside subsurface are quite common. For this region, monitoring of magnetic field is utterly significant as any fluctuations can distort the tool sensor performance with ultimately enlarging the uncertainty in azimuth. To guide a well to its desire location, measurement while drilling (MWD) tool needs to be operated with utmost precision; however, its accuracy compromises as a result of magnetic interferences from drill string and nearby magnetic material. The performance of this tool depends upon its sensors. Any distortion in sensor performance can lead to problems such as multiple sidetracking and increase in overall project cost. Furthermore, the same BHA was also placed in a region of Pakistan and the impact drill string interference was observed. It was discovered that the interferences that had tremendous impact on magnetometer Z-component in Barents Sea had a drastic reduction in the region of Pakistan as it is situated in low latitude, where uncertainty in azimuth is low. In this work, an exemplary bottom-hole assembly (BHA) was analyzed and the impact of individual drill string components interferences was observed on the MWD sensors. It was perceived that the bit was responsible for creating the major distortion in MWD sensor. Apart from that, it was also investigated that the location of the well also plays a vital role in this distortion. This intervention in the sensors is created by a vast difference between the used actual length and the recommended length of nonmagnetic drill collar in the BHA. Numerically, it was investigated that if the physical distance between the sensors and bit is increased, then this interference is reduced. It was also apparent that the Z-component of the magnetometer was utterly distorted because of this interference, while the X- and Y-components were proved to be independent of these interferences. It was further examined that the effects of latitude and longitude play a significant role in the course of changing the impact of these errors on magnetization.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Energy,Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology
Reference13 articles.
1. Beleggia M, De Graef M, Millev Y (2006) Demagnetization factors of the general ellipsoid: an alternative to the Maxwell approach. Phil Mag 86(16):2451–2466
2. Berchan BA (2015) Drilling, completion, intervention and P&A design and operations. NTNU, Trondheim
3. Edvardsen I (2015) Effects of geomagnetic disturbances on offshore magnetic directional wellbore positioning in the Northern Auroral Zone. The Arctic University of Norway, Tromso
4. Edvardsen I, Nyrnes E, Johnsen MG, Hansen TL (2013) Improving the accuracy and reliability of MWD/magnetic-wellbore-directional surveying in the Barents sea. In: Annual technical conference and exhibition 2013. SPE, New Orleans
5. Ekseth R (1998) Uncertainties in connection with the determination of wellbore positions. Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献