The new approach to establish a better match between obtained electrofacies and hydraulic flow units for oligo-Miocene reservoir rocks, North of Dezful Embayment, SW Iran

Abstract

AbstractRoutine core analysis data (porosity and permeability)—used in various methods for hydraulic flow unit (HFU) determination of reservoir rocks—are unavailable in all drilled wells. On the other hand, raw petrophysical wireline logs—applied to determine reservoir electrofacies (EF)—are usually available in all wells. Since cores provide accurate data on reservoir characteristics, the lack of cores has always interested petroleum geologists and engineers. Therefore, introducing a new method to give almost accurate data about reservoir rocks in uncored wells has always interested petroleum geologists and engineers. As the type of input data that was used to determine HFUs and reservoir EFs are fundamentally different from each other, providing an approach that can create a better match between the results of these two rock typing methods is always one of significant interest for researchers. In this research, capillary pressure (Pc) test results are vital in obtaining reservoir EFs compatible with HFUs for the Oligo-Miocene Asmari Formation in Qale Nar Oilfield. So that only EFs that are compatible with Pc test results are approved. Flow zone indicator (FZI) method was applied to determine five HFU including A (Log FZI > − 0.05, average of core porosity and permeability are 5.8% and 0.37 mD) to E (Log FZI < − 0.65, average of core porosity and permeability are 0.07% and 0.03 mD). Furthermore, based on raw petrophysical wireline logs and MRGC algorithm in Geolog software, five electrofacies (EF) were indicated containing EF 1 (average of core porosity and permeability are 5.91% and 0.38 mD) to EF 5 (average of core porosity and permeability are 0.08% and 0.02 mD). The correlation between HFUs and EFs shows that HFU A to HFU E is compatible with EF 1 to EF 5. Also, examining the obtained electrofacies in the modified Lorenz plot indicates that EF 1 and 2 perfectly match intervals with a high fluid flow regime. By this method, it is possible to provide an almost accurate estimation of hydraulic flow unit distribution for wells and intervals without cores.