Flow unit classification and characterization with emphasis on the clustering methods: a case study in a highly heterogeneous carbonate reservoir, eastern margin of Dezful Embayment, SW Iran

Abstract

AbstractPrevious attempts to classify flow units in Iranian carbonate reservoirs, based on porosity and permeability, have faced challenges in correlating the rock's pore size distribution with the capillary pressure profile. The innovation of this study highlights the role of clustering techniques, such as Discrete Rock Type, Probability, Global Hydraulic Element, and Winland's Standard Chart in enhancing the reservoir's rock categorization. These techniques are integrated with established flow unit classification methods. They include Lucia, FZI, FZI*, Winland R35, and the improved stratigraphic modified Lorenz plot. The research accurately links diverse pore geometries to characteristic capillary pressure profiles, addressing heterogeneity in intricate reservoirs. The findings indicate that clustering methods can identify specific flow units, but do not significantly improve their classification. The effectiveness of these techniques varies depending on the flow unit classification method employed. For instance, probability-based methods yield surpassing results for low-porosity rocks when utilizing the FZI* approach. The discrete technique generates the highest number of flow unit classes but provides the worst result. Not all clustering techniques reveal discernible advantages when integrated with the FZI method. In the second part, the study creatively suggests that rock classification can be achieved by concurrently clustering irreducible water saturation (SWIR) and porosity in unsuccessful flow unit delineation cases. The SWIR log was estimated by establishing a smart correlation between porosity and SWIR in the pay zone, where water saturation and SWIR match. Then, the estimated saturation was dispersed throughout the reservoir. Subsequently, the neural network technique was employed to cluster and propagate the three finalized flow units. This methodology is an effective recommendation when conventional flow unit methods fail. The study also investigates influential factors causing the failure of flow unit classification methods, including pore geometry, oil wettability, and saturation in heterogeneous reservoirs.