International comparison of nine accreditation programmes for ambulatory care facilities-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

International comparison of nine accreditation programmes for ambulatory care facilities

Published:2011-03-23 Issue:5 Volume:19 Page:425-432
ISSN:0943-1853
Container-title:Journal of Public Health
language:en
Short-container-title:J Public Health

Author:

Auras Silke,Geraedts Max

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Link

http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10389-011-0408-4.pdf

Reference23 articles.

1. Bohigas L, Heaton C (2000) Methods for external evaluation of health care institutions. Int J Qual Health Care 12:231–238

2. Buetow SA, Wellingham J (2003) Accreditation of general practices: challenges and lessons. Qual Saf Health Care 12:129–135

3. Buetow S, Wensing M (2008) What might European general practice learn from New Zealand experience of practice accreditation? Eur J Gen Pract 14:40–44

4. Collopy BT (2000) Clinical indicators in accreditation: an effective stimulus to improve patient care. Int J Qual Health Care 12:211–216

5. Courté-Wienecke S (2000) Zertifizierungsverfahren für ambulante Versorgung in den USA (Accreditation for ambulatory health care in the USA). Z Ärztl Fortbild Qualitätssich 94:634–638

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. An evaluation of an electronic audit and feedback system for patient safety in a tertiary hospital setting: A study protocol;Health Informatics Journal;2021-04

2. Counting the costs of accreditation in acute care: an activity-based costing approach;BMJ Open;2015-09

3. Quality of Care and Quality of Life: Convergence or Divergence?;Health Services Insights;2014-01

4. Increasing patient centredness in outpatient care through closer collaboration with patient groups?;Health Policy;2012-10