Abstract
Abstract
Aims
This study examines the impact of COVID-19 lockdown on postpartum mothers in England, with the aim of identifying opportunities to improve maternal experience and wellbeing. The postpartum/postnatal period is widely acknowledged as a time when mothers require greater levels of support from multiple sources. However, stay-at-home orders, commonly known as “lockdown,” deployed in some countries to limit COVID-19 transmission reduced access to support. In England, many postpartum mothers navigated household isolation within an intensive mothering and expert parenting culture. Examining the impact of lockdown may reveal strengths and weaknesses in current policy and practice.
Subject and methods
We conducted online focus groups involving 20 mothers living in London, England, with “lockdown babies,” following up on our earlier online survey on social support and maternal wellbeing. We thematically analysed focus group transcripts, and identified key themes around Lockdown Experience and Determinants of Lockdown Experience.
Results
Participants raised some positives of lockdown, including fostering connections and protection from external expectations, but also raised many negatives, including social isolation, institutional abandonment, and intense relationships within the household. Potential reasons behind variations in lockdown experience include physical environments, timing of birth, and number of children. Our findings reflect how current systems may be “trapping” some families into the male-breadwinner/female-caregiver family model, while intensive mothering and expert parenting culture may be increasing maternal stress and undermining responsive mothering.
Conclusions
Facilitating partners to stay at home during the postpartum period (e.g., increasing paternity leave and flexible working) and establishing peer/community support to decentre reliance on professional parenting experts may promote positive postpartum maternal experience and wellbeing.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
Reference40 articles.
1. Apple RD (1995) Constructing mothers: Scientific motherhood in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. Social History Med 8(2):161–178. https://doi.org/10.1093/shm/8.2.161
2. Arnot M, Brandl E, Campbell OLK, Chen Y, Du J, Dyble M, Emmott EH, Ge E, Kretschmer LDW, Mace R, Micheletti AJC, Nila S, Peacey S, Salali GD, Zhang H (2020) How evolutionary behavioural sciences can help us understand behaviour in a pandemic. Evol Med Public Health 2020(1):264–278. https://doi.org/10.1093/emph/eoaa038
3. Babetin K (2020) The Birth of a Mother: A Psychological Transformation. J Prenat Perinat Psychol Health 34(5):410–428 ProQuest Central
4. Black MM, Aboud FE (2011) Responsive feeding is embedded in a theoretical framework of responsive parenting. J Nutr 141(3):490–494. https://doi.org/10.3945/jn.110.129973
5. Brown J, Kirk-Wade E (2021) Coronavirus: A history of ‘Lockdown laws’ in England. House Commons Library. https://researchbriefings.files.parliament.uk/documents/CBP-9068/CBP-9068.pdf. Accessed 14 Feb 2023