Quality criteria/key components for high quality of diabetes management to avoid diabetes-related complications-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Quality criteria/key components for high quality of diabetes management to avoid diabetes-related complications

Published:2020-02-24 Issue:5 Volume:29 Page:1235-1241
ISSN:2198-1833
Container-title:Journal of Public Health
language:en
Short-container-title:J Public Health (Berl.)

Author:

Rothe Ulrike^ORCID,Manuwald Ulf,Kugler Joachim,Schulze Jan

Abstract

Abstract Aim The aim of this review shoud be to map data and to identify quality indicators for good practices for diabetes management and secondary prevention, specifically of type 2 diabetes. Methods To achieve this aim we performed the following steps: (i) a literature review on evaluation criteria, (ii) selection of quality criteria and key components for high quality of care, (iii) creation of a checklist to identify the best practice of diabetes management based on the detected criteria. Results The literature search about the quality indicators for diabetes care resulted in the following: identifying of key components and quality indicators for structure, process and outcome quality. Conclusions The set of quality criteria will be discussed and used to identify the best practice diabetes management programs for secondary prevention of type 2 diabetes.

Funder

Technische Universität Dresden

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Link

https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10389-020-01227-w.pdf

Reference51 articles.

1. ADA (2014) Standards of medical care in diabetes—2014. Diabetes Care 37(Suppl.1):S14–S80. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc14-S014

2. Alberti KG et al (2009) Harmonizing the metabolic syndrome: a joint interim statement of the nternational Diabetes Federation Task Force on Epidemiology and Prevention; National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; American Heart Association; World Heart Federation; International Atherosclerosis Society; and International Association for the Study of Obesity. Circulation 120:1640–1645. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.192644

3. Benedetti MM et al. (2009) The BIRO Consortium. Best information through regional outcomes: a shared European diabetes information system for policy and practice. University of Perugia, Perugia

4. Bodicoat DH et al. (2014) The impact of a programme to improve quality of care for people with type 2 diabetes on hard to reach groups: The GEDAPS study. Prim Care Diabetes 9(3):211–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pcd.2014.08.001

5. Burgers JS (2010) Measuring intensification of therapy: a new indicator for quality of chronic care. Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde 154:A1602 (Original in Dutch)

Cited by 5 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Quality of Chronic Disease (Diabetes & Hypertension) Care in Health Care Facilities in High Disease Burden Areas in Sidama Region: Cross-Sectional Study;Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare;2024-02

2. Real-world demographic patterns of users of a digital primary prevention service for diabetes;Cardiovascular Endocrinology & Metabolism;2022-12-09

3. Chronic-Care-Management Programs for Multimorbid Patients with Diabetes in Europe: A Scoping Review with the Aim to Identify the Best Practice;Journal of Diabetes Research;2021-11-09

4. Evaluating the Impact of the Diabetes Mellitus Strategy for the National Health System: An Interrupted Time Series Analysis;Healthcare;2021-07-12

5. Comparison the health-related quality of life in type 2 diabetic patients and healthy people: a cross-sectional study in Iran;CLIN DIABETOL;2021