The effectiveness of clinical pathways in inpatient settings - an umbrella review

Author:

Büscher AnneORCID,Kugler JoachimORCID

Abstract

Abstract Aim The aim of this research is to summarize the effectiveness of clinical pathways in inpatient settings in industrialized countries to gain implications for hospital management or identify further research needs. Subject and methods Systematic literature reviews and meta-analyses published in English from 2010 to August 30, 2023, investigating the effectiveness of clinical inpatient pathways are identified, summarized, and synthesized. PubMed, Cochrane Library, and MEDLINE databases were searched. Results The search identified a total of ten systematic reviews, of which seven also conducted meta-analyses. The results show substantial heterogeneity in the data. In total, data from 140 primary studies are included. The parameters that were most frequently examined are complication rates, impact on length of stay, readmission rates, mortality, documentation quality, and hospital and care costs. Conclusion A positive impact of clinical pathways, including a reduced risk of complications, reduced length of stay, and a better documentation quality, can be summarized. However, the definition of the concept of clinical pathways already differs and the outcomes that were examined also differ in their definition and measurement. The results of this research on clinical pathways are not sufficient for transfer to the current situation. The results show an added value for patients, staff, and relatives, particularly for clinical pathways that involve frequent illnesses, are cost-intensive, and require a lot of communication between different professionals. Furthermore, it can be concluded that further research with randomized controlled trials is necessary to investigate the effectiveness of clinical pathways.

Funder

Technische Universität Dresden

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Reference19 articles.

1. Chan RJ, Webster J, Bowers A (2018) End-of-life care pathway for improving outcomes in caring for the dying. CDSR. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD008006.pub4

2. Chawla A, Westrich K, Matter S, Kaltenboeck A, Dubois R (2016) Care pathways in US healtcare settings: current successes and limitations, and future challenges. Am J Manag Care 22:53–62

3. Gordon SA, Reiter ER (2015) Effectiveness of critical care pathways for head and neck cancer surgery: a systematic review. Head Neck 38:1421–1427. https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.24265

4. IQTIG (2020) Tätigkeitsbericht 2019: https://iqtig.org/dateien/berichte/2020/IQTIG_Taetigkeitsbericht_2019_barrierefrei.pdf. Accessed 18 Sept 2023

5. Manteuffel L (2020) Rehabilitation: Messbarer Patientennutzen als Ziel. Dtsch Arztebl 117(9): A-434 / B-380 / C-366

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3