Abstract
Abstract
Purpose
The main purpose of this study was to perform an immunohistochemical, functional, and anatomical evaluation of patients with idiopathic epiretinal membrane (ERM).
Methods
Twenty-four specimens of idiopathic ERM from 24 consecutive patients who underwent 23 G pars plana vitrectomy for ERM and internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling at the San Juan University Hospital in Alicante (Spain) in 2019 were analyzed. All patients underwent a complete ophthalmological examination including measurement of best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and macular analysis by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) at the time of diagnosis and 3 months after surgery. Specific glial fibrillar acid protein antibodies (GFAP) and S100 calcium-binding protein β (S100β) immunostaining markers were used to identify the macroglial component of the ERM, Müller cells, and astrocytes. Ionized calcium-binding adapter molecule 1 protein (Iba1) antibodies were used as specific markers for inflammatory cells, such as microglia and macrophages.
Results
Mean preoperative BCVA measured with Snellen chart was 0.3 and 0.6 preoperatively and at 3 months after surgery, respectively. SD-OCT identified 15 patients (62.5%) with a disruption of the outer retinal hyperreflective bands. The immunohistochemical study showed the presence of Müller cells in almost all cases (91.6%), as well of abundant microglia and macrophages. Microglia and macrophages were more frequently present in earlier stages of ERM. Microglia were present in ERM independently of the outer retinal hyperreflective bands integrity as measured by SD-OCT. A greater presence of macrophages was found in those ERMs with no outer retinal hyperreflective band disruption.
Conclusions
Müller cells seem to be the most frequent cell group in ERMs, with also presence of microglia cells and macrophages. Astrocytes were more frequently found in early stages of ERMs. Microglia and macrophages were most frequent in ERMs with early stage (1, 2, or 3) than in advanced stages (4).
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference25 articles.
1. Ożóg MK, Nowak-Wąs M, Rokicki W (2023) Pathophysiology and clinical aspects of epiretinal membrane – review. Front Med (Lausanne) 10:1121270
2. Gass JDM (1997) Macular dysfunction caused by epiretinal membrane contraction. In: Gass JDM. Stereoscopic atlas of macular disease: diagnosis and treatment. Vol.2. 4th ed. St Louis, Mo: Mosby, pp. 938–50
3. Govetto A, Lalane RA, Sarraf D, Figueroa MS, Hubschman JP (2017) Insights into epiretinal membranes: presence of ectopic inner foveal layers and a new optical coherence tomography staging scheme. Am J Ophthalmol 175:99–113
4. Fung AT, Galvin J, Tran T (2021) Epiretinal membrane: a review. Clin Exp Ophthalmol 49:289–308
5. Coltrini D, Belleri M, Gambicorti E, Romano D, Morescalchi F, Chandran AMK, Calza S, Semeraro F, Presta M (2020) Gene expression analysis identifies two distinct molecular clusters of idiopatic epiretinal membranes. Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Basis Dis 1866:165938