Sutureless versus conventional deep sclerectomy for management of open angle glaucoma

Author:

Kotb Mohamed Sabry,El Gharbawy Shahenda Ahmed,Abdelrahman Ahmed Mostafa,Makled Hebatalla SamirORCID

Abstract

Abstract Introduction To compare sutureless deep sclerectomy to conventional deep sclerectomy regarding their lowering effect on intraocular pressure (IOP) in cases with open-angle glaucoma. Methods This is a prospective interventional randomized comparative study that included 60 eyes of 50 patients with open-angle glaucoma (OAG) who were indicated for surgical intervention. Patients were recruited from the glaucoma subspecialty clinic of the Cairo University teaching hospital and were divided into two groups: group A (underwent sutureless deep sclerectomy) and group B (underwent conventional deep sclerectomy). Results Both surgeries showed significant reduction of IOP all through the study period: in group A, mean reduction was 71.37%, 53.35%, 50.3%, and 44.33% at 1st day, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months respectively, and in group B, mean reduction was 57.62%, 40.63%, 37.41%, and 31.68% at 1st day, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months, respectively. Comparison between percentage of reduction in both groups showed no statistically significant difference. Also, use of anti-glaucoma medications dropped significantly at 6 months postoperatively in both groups with no significant difference between the 2 groups. Regarding reported complications, 12.9% in group A and 10.3% in group B presented with non-serious complications. One month postoperatively, UBM detected non-functioning blebs in 6.4% of group A and 3.4% in group B. Other cases with non-functioning blebs were detected at 3 and 6 months postoperatively, and all cases were managed. Conclusion Sutureless deep sclerectomy seems to be a safe and effective modification, with significant IOP reduction in POAG.

Funder

Cairo University

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience,Sensory Systems,Ophthalmology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3