Abstract
Abstract
Purpose
Visual function is a complex process in which external visual stimuli are interpreted. Patients with retinal diseases and prolonged follow-up times may experience changes in their visual function that are not detected by the standard visual acuity measure, as they are a result of other alterations in visual function. With the advancement of different methods to evaluate visual function, additional measurements have become available, and further standardization suggests that some methods may be promising for use in clinical trials or routine clinical practice. The objectives of this article are to review these additional measurements and to provide guidance on their application.
Methods
The Vision Academy’s membership of international retinal disease experts reviewed the literature and developed consensus recommendations for the application of additional measures of visual function in routine clinical practice or clinical trials.
Results
Measures such as low-luminance visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, retinal fixation and microperimetry, and reading performance are measures which can complement visual acuity measurements to provide an assessment of overall visual function, including impact on patients’ quality of life. Measures such as dark adaptation, color vision testing, binocular vision testing, visual recognition testing, and shape discrimination require further optimization and validation before they can be implemented in everyday clinical practice.
Conclusion
Additional measurements of visual function may help identify patients who could benefit from earlier diagnosis, detection of disease progression, and therapeutic intervention. New and additional functional clinical trial endpoints are required to fully understand the early stages of macular disease, its progression, and the response to treatment.
Funder
Bayer Consumer Health
Università degli Studi di Padova
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience,Sensory Systems,Ophthalmology
Reference113 articles.
1. Trick GL (2003) Beyond visual acuity: new and complementary tests of visual function. Neurol Clin 21:363–386. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0733-8619(02)00104-4
2. Kniestedt C, Stamper RL (2003) Visual acuity and its measurement. Ophthalmol Clin North Am 16:155–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0896-1549(03)00013-0
3. Wall M, Johnson CA (2005) Principles and techniques of the examination of the visual sensory system Walsh and Hoyt’s Clinical Neuro-Ophthalmology. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, PA, pp 89–93
4. Sheedy JE, Bailey IL, Raasch TW (1984) Visual acuity and chart luminance. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 61:595–600. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006324-198409000-00010
5. McClure ME, Hart PM, Jackson AJ, Stevenson MR, Chakravarthy U (2000) Macular degeneration: do conventional measurements of impaired visual function equate with visual disability? Br J Ophthalmol 84:244–250. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.84.3.244