Evolution of macular atrophy in eyes with neovascular age-related macular degeneration compared to fellow non-neovascular eyes
-
Published:2023-08-11
Issue:12
Volume:261
Page:3425-3436
-
ISSN:0721-832X
-
Container-title:Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol
Author:
Blazaki Styliani, Blavakis Emmanouil, Chlouverakis Gregory, Bontzos Georgios, Chatziralli Irini, Smoustopoulos Georgios, Dimitriou Eleni, Stavrakakis Anastasios, Kabanarou Stamatina, Xirou Tina, Vavvas Demetrios G., Tsilimbaris Miltiadis K.ORCID
Abstract
Abstract
Purpose
Τo evaluate the evolution of macular atrophy (MA) in patients with neovascular AMD (nAMD), compared with their fellow eyes exhibiting dry AMD (dAMD).
Methods
This retrospective study included 124 patients from three centers treated with anti-VEGF in their nAMD eye and having dAMD in the fellow eye. Patients without MA at baseline were analyzed to study the time to first MA development. Synchronous and unsynchronous time course of MA was also studied. MA was evaluated using near-infrared images, while all available optical coherence tomography (OCT) images were used to confirm the criteria proposed by the Classification of Atrophy Meetings group for complete MA.
Results
MA first detection in nAMD eyes increased significantly from year 2 to 6 compared to dAMD eyes. Over the study’s follow-up, 45.1% of nAMD-E developed MA, compared to 16.5% of fellow eyes (p < 0.001). When MA in the two eyes was compared in a synchronous paired manner over 4 years, nAMD eyes had an average MA progression rate of 0.275 mm/year versus 0.110 mm/year in their fellow dAMD eyes. Multivariate ANOVA revealed significant time (p < 0.001), eye (p = 0.003), and time-eye interaction (p < 0.001) effects. However, when MA did develop in dAMD eyes and was compared in an asynchronous manner to MA of nAMD eyes, it was found to progress faster in dAMD eyes (dAMD: 0.295 mm/year vs. nAMD: 0.176 mm/year) with a significant time-eye interaction (p = 0.015).
Conclusions
In this study, a significant difference in MA incidence and progression was documented in eyes with nAMD under treatment, compared to fellow eye exhibiting dAMD. Eyes with nAMD tended to develop more MA compared to fellow dAMD eyes. However, when atrophy did develop in the fellow dAMD eyes, it progressed faster over time compared to MA in nAMD eyes.
Funder
University of Crete
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience,Sensory Systems,Ophthalmology
Reference39 articles.
1. Congdon N, O’Colmain B, Klaver CC, Klein R, Muñoz B, Friedman DS, Kempen J, Taylor HR, Mitchell P, Eye Diseases Prevalence Research Group (2004) Causes and prevalence of visual impairment among adults in the United States. Arch Ophthalmol 122:477–485 2. Resnikoff S, Pascolini D, Etya’ale D, Kocur I, Pararajasegaram R, Pokharel GP, Mariotti SP (2004) Global data on visual impairment in the year 2002. Bull World Health Organ 82:844–851 3. Wong WL, Su X, Li X, Cheung CMG, Klein R, Cheng CY, Wong TY (2014) Global prevalence of age-related macular degeneration and disease burden projection for 2020 and 2040: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Glob Health 2:106–116 4. Klein R, Davis MD, Magli YL, Segal P, Klein BE, Hubbard L (1991) The Wisconsin age-related maculopathy grading system. Ophthalmology 98:1128–1134 5. Rosenfeld PJ, Brown DM, Heier JS, Boyer DS, Kaiser PK, Chung CY, Kim RY, MARINA Study Group (2006) Ranibizumab for neovascular age-related macular degeneration. N Engl J Med 355:1419–1431
|
|