The Routine Follow-up Head CT: Is it Still a Necessary Step in the Thrombolysis Pathway?

Abstract

Abstract Background The 24-h head computed tomography (CT) scan following intravenous tissue plasminogen activator or mechanical thrombectomy (MT) is currently part of most acute stroke protocols. However, as evidence emerges regarding who is at highest risk for treatment complications, the utility of routine neuroimaging for all patients has become less clear. Methods Four hundred seventy-five patients presenting with acute ischemic stroke to Johns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center between 2004 and 2018 and treated with intravenous tissue plasminogen activator and/or MT were evaluated. Neuroimaging performed during the first 48 h of hospitalization was reviewed for edema, hemorrhagic transformation (HT), or other findings altering management. Early imaging (< 24 h), performed for neurologic deterioration, was compared with imaging performed per protocol (24 ± 6 h). Factors predictive of radiographically and clinically significant findings on per-protocol imaging were determined. Results One hundred fifty-three patients (32%) underwent early imaging. These patients generally had more severe strokes. HT was found in 15% of cases. For the remaining patients (n = 322), imaging at 24 h impacted acute management for only 24 patients: resulting in emergent hemicraniectomy in 1 (0.3%) and leading to additional imaging to monitor asymptomatic HT or edema in 23 (7.1%). Advanced age, higher stroke severity, MT, and atrial fibrillation were associated with significant findings on the 24-h CT scan. Only 2 of the 24 patients had an initial National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score of < 7. Conclusions The 24-h head CT scan does not change management for most patients, particularly those with low National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale scores who do not undergo MT. Consideration should be given to removing routine follow-up imaging from postthrombolysis protocols in favor of an examination-based approach.