A Meta-analysis Paradox or Simply Broadening the Perspective?-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

A Meta-analysis Paradox or Simply Broadening the Perspective?

Published:2022-09-01 Issue:3 Volume:37 Page:815-816
ISSN:1541-6933
Container-title:Neurocritical Care
language:en
Short-container-title:Neurocrit Care

Author:

Geraldini Federico^ORCID,De Cassai Alessandro,Diana Paolo,Boscolo Annalisa,Munari Marina

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine,Neurology (clinical)

Link

https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12028-022-01590-4.pdf

Reference5 articles.

1. Welling LC, Rabelo NN, Aguiar LB, et al. Intravenous nimodipine versus enteral nimodipine: the meta-analysis paradox. Neurocrit Care. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-022-01589-x.

2. Geraldini F, De Cassai A, Diana P, et al. A comparison between enteral and intravenous nimodipine in subarachnoid hemorrhage: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Neurocrit Care. 2022;36(3):1071–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-022-01493-4.

3. Andersen CR, Fitzgerald E, Delaney A, Finfer S. A systematic review of outcome measures employed in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) clinical research. Neurocrit Care. 2019;30(3):534–41.

4. Mees DSM, Rinkel GJE, Feigin VL, et al. Calcium antagonists for aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007;3:CD000277. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD000277.pub3.

5. Altman D, Ashby D, Birks J, et al. Chapter 10: analysing data and undertaking meta-analyses. In: Deeks JJ, Higgins JPT, Altman DG, et al., editors. Cochrane Handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 6.3. Cochrane, 2022. www.training.cochrane.org/handbook. Cited 5 Aug 2022.