Development of a Quality Indicator Set for the Optimal Acute Management of Moderate to Severe Traumatic Brain Injury in the Australian Context

Author:

Jeffcote Toby,Battistuzzo Camila R.,Roach Rebecca,Bell Catherine,Bendinelli Cino,Rashford Stephen,Jithoo Ron,Gabbe Belinda J.,Flower Oliver,O’Reilly Gerard,Campbell Lewis T.,Cooper D. James,Balogh Zsolt J.,Udy Andrew A., ,Chow Andrew,Delaney Anthony,Hooper Andrew,Nadkarni Aniket,Poulter Amber-Louise J.,Wells Adam,Reddi Benjamin,Mitra Biswadev,Sheridan Brad,Burns Brian,Rienecker Carly,Bodnar Daniel,Bowen David,Gantner Dashiell,Nasrallah Fatima,Healy Geoffrey,Ryan Gleen,Anstey James R.,Hsu Jeremy,Bellapart Judith,King Kate,Harbour Kelly,Jeffree Rosalind L.,Bihari Shailesh,Fitzgerald Melinda,Noonan Michael,Plummer Mark,Reade Michael C.,Waak Michaela,Weeden Mark,Cooper Paul David,Cameron Peter,Bellomo Rinaldo,McNamara Robert,McGloughlin Stephen,O’Brien Terence J.,Withers Teresa,Westerlund Torg

Abstract

Abstract Background The aim of this study was to develop a consensus-based set of indicators of high-quality acute moderate to severe traumatic brain injury (msTBI) clinical management that can be used to measure structure, process, and outcome factors that are likely to influence patient outcomes. This is the first stage of the PRECISION-TBI program, which is a prospective cohort study that aims to identify and promote optimal clinical management of msTBI in Australia. Methods A preliminary set of 45 quality indicators was developed based on available evidence. An advisory committee of established experts in the field refined the initial indicator set in terms of content coverage, proportional representation, contamination, and supporting evidence. The refined indicator set was then distributed to a wider Delphi panel for assessment of each indicator in terms of validity, measurement feasibility, variability, and action feasibility. Inclusion in the final indicator set was contingent on prespecified inclusion scoring. Results The indicator set was structured according to the care pathway of msTBI and included prehospital, emergency department, neurosurgical, intensive care, and rehabilitation indicators. Measurement domains included structure indicators, logistic indicators, and clinical management indicators. The Delphi panel consisted of 44 participants (84% physician, 12% nursing, and 4% primary research) with a median of 15 years of practice. Of the 47 indicators included in the second round of the Delphi, 32 indicators were approved by the Delphi group. Conclusions This study identified a set of 32 quality indicators that can be used to structure data collection to drive quality improvement in the clinical management of msTBI. They will also be used to guide feedback to PRECISION-TBI’s participating sites.

Funder

Medical Research Future Fund

Monash University

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3